Figure S4. (A) The consensus taxonomic profile of kefir samples, as predicted by averaging the results from each species classifier. (B) Dissimilarity plot based on the average results from each species classifier. (PNG 97Â kb
Table S5. a Prokaryotic OTUs distribution in samples. b Methanotropic OTUs distribution in samples (...
Results of similarity calculation for OTU-based family and genus-level classification. (DOCX 15.1 kb
Comparison of taxonomic classification with four different methods: MetaBIT, Metaxa2, MEGAN, and Kra...
Figure S3. Species detected ≥ 2.5% relative abundance in kefir samples using each species classifier...
Figure S6. Dissimilarity plot based on the relative abundances of the 865 level-4 enzyme commission ...
Table S4. Statistical differences in alpha diversity at different sequencing depths. (XLSX 10Â kb
Figure S2. False positives detected using each species classifier with the total number of reads fro...
Figure S8. SUPER-FOCUS level 2 subsystems which were significantly altered at different sequencing d...
Table S5. Statistical differences in the relative abundances of enzyme commission (EC) level-4 categ...
Taxonomic composition of samples. The relative abundance of each group in subgingival and supragingi...
Table S1. PERMANOVA analysis used to assess microbial community structure differences. Table S2. Med...
Table S7. Summary of selected protein families (Pfam) based on rpstblastx algorithm. (PDF 410 kb
Example of similarity calculation (results of calculation in the yellow area of Additional file 12)....
Relative abundance of intestinal microbiome (species level classification of OTUs). (XLSX 2182 kb
The predictions on all samples: (a) SVM vs random forests, (b) SVM vs SourceTracker. The values on x...
Table S5. a Prokaryotic OTUs distribution in samples. b Methanotropic OTUs distribution in samples (...
Results of similarity calculation for OTU-based family and genus-level classification. (DOCX 15.1 kb
Comparison of taxonomic classification with four different methods: MetaBIT, Metaxa2, MEGAN, and Kra...
Figure S3. Species detected ≥ 2.5% relative abundance in kefir samples using each species classifier...
Figure S6. Dissimilarity plot based on the relative abundances of the 865 level-4 enzyme commission ...
Table S4. Statistical differences in alpha diversity at different sequencing depths. (XLSX 10Â kb
Figure S2. False positives detected using each species classifier with the total number of reads fro...
Figure S8. SUPER-FOCUS level 2 subsystems which were significantly altered at different sequencing d...
Table S5. Statistical differences in the relative abundances of enzyme commission (EC) level-4 categ...
Taxonomic composition of samples. The relative abundance of each group in subgingival and supragingi...
Table S1. PERMANOVA analysis used to assess microbial community structure differences. Table S2. Med...
Table S7. Summary of selected protein families (Pfam) based on rpstblastx algorithm. (PDF 410 kb
Example of similarity calculation (results of calculation in the yellow area of Additional file 12)....
Relative abundance of intestinal microbiome (species level classification of OTUs). (XLSX 2182 kb
The predictions on all samples: (a) SVM vs random forests, (b) SVM vs SourceTracker. The values on x...
Table S5. a Prokaryotic OTUs distribution in samples. b Methanotropic OTUs distribution in samples (...
Results of similarity calculation for OTU-based family and genus-level classification. (DOCX 15.1 kb
Comparison of taxonomic classification with four different methods: MetaBIT, Metaxa2, MEGAN, and Kra...