Add to ORKGIn WildEarth Guardians v. U.S. BLM, the District Court of Colorado showed that economic and developmental uncertainty is an area where agencies are given broad discretion in deciding whether an impact is reasonably foreseeable and requires a further conformity analysis under the Clean Air Act. This case exemplifies the tactical limitation of using climate change and the science around it to force greater analysis of projects undertaken by federal agencies. However, the court presented a potential roadmap for successful future challenges
A federal court in Montana vacated the lease sale of several large oil and gas developments in Monta...
In some respects, the year has been without significant new revisions to the oil and gas law in Colo...
In Pit River Tribe v. Bureau of Land Management, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Ci...
In WildEarth Guardians v. U.S. BLM, the District Court of Colorado showed that economic and developm...
WildEarth Guardians v. Zinke marks an important decision prompting the Bureau of Land Management to ...
To what extent must the BLM analyze potential climate change impacts where millions of acres of publ...
The Colorado District Court in WildEarth Guardians v. United States Office of Surface Mining, Reclam...
Wildearth Guardians v. United States Office of Surface Mining, Reclamation and Enforcement sprung fr...
As part of a comprehensive strategy to keep coal “in the ground,” environmental plaintiffs challenge...
In 2007, the Bureau of Land Management adopted a resource management plan that essentially made all ...
The United States District Court for the District of Montana granted Plaintiffs summary judgment aga...
In Great Basin Resource Watch v. Bureau of Land Management, the Ninth Circuit invalidated the BLM’s ...
One of the most difficult challenges facing public land managers today is how to address climate cha...
In Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership v. Salazar, the United States District Court of Appea...
After President Trump’s Executive Order No. 13783 encouraging relaxing regulatory burdens on energy ...
A federal court in Montana vacated the lease sale of several large oil and gas developments in Monta...
In some respects, the year has been without significant new revisions to the oil and gas law in Colo...
In Pit River Tribe v. Bureau of Land Management, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Ci...
In WildEarth Guardians v. U.S. BLM, the District Court of Colorado showed that economic and developm...
WildEarth Guardians v. Zinke marks an important decision prompting the Bureau of Land Management to ...
To what extent must the BLM analyze potential climate change impacts where millions of acres of publ...
The Colorado District Court in WildEarth Guardians v. United States Office of Surface Mining, Reclam...
Wildearth Guardians v. United States Office of Surface Mining, Reclamation and Enforcement sprung fr...
As part of a comprehensive strategy to keep coal “in the ground,” environmental plaintiffs challenge...
In 2007, the Bureau of Land Management adopted a resource management plan that essentially made all ...
The United States District Court for the District of Montana granted Plaintiffs summary judgment aga...
In Great Basin Resource Watch v. Bureau of Land Management, the Ninth Circuit invalidated the BLM’s ...
One of the most difficult challenges facing public land managers today is how to address climate cha...
In Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership v. Salazar, the United States District Court of Appea...
After President Trump’s Executive Order No. 13783 encouraging relaxing regulatory burdens on energy ...
A federal court in Montana vacated the lease sale of several large oil and gas developments in Monta...
In some respects, the year has been without significant new revisions to the oil and gas law in Colo...
In Pit River Tribe v. Bureau of Land Management, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Ci...