Add to ORKGThe United States District Court for the District of Montana granted Plaintiffs summary judgment against BLM and the State of Wyoming. The court ruled that BLM violated NEPA and the APA because it failed to consider alternative leasing programs and the broad downstream impacts of coal, oil, and gas leasing in two Powder River Basin resource management plans. This decision followed WORC I & II, in which the court remanded the same plans to BLM to correct deficiencies. Following BLM’s revisions, Plaintiffs again sued in this case, arguing the revisions were still deficient under NEPA
In 2017, Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke issued a new order lifting the previous administration...
After President Trump’s Executive Order No. 13783 encouraging relaxing regulatory burdens on energy ...
In Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership v. Salazar, the United States District Court of Appea...
The United States District Court for the District of Montana granted Plaintiffs summary judgment aga...
To what extent must the BLM analyze potential climate change impacts where millions of acres of publ...
In Great Basin Resource Watch v. Bureau of Land Management, the Ninth Circuit invalidated the BLM’s ...
A federal court in Montana vacated the lease sale of several large oil and gas developments in Monta...
In Pit River Tribe v. Bureau of Land Management, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Ci...
WildEarth Guardians v. Zinke marks an important decision prompting the Bureau of Land Management to ...
As part of a comprehensive strategy to keep coal “in the ground,” environmental plaintiffs challenge...
In 2007, the Bureau of Land Management adopted a resource management plan that essentially made all ...
In Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone of Nevada v. United States Department of the Interior, the Nint...
In its second trip before the District Court of Montana, the Bull Mountain Mine expansion was again ...
The Colorado District Court in WildEarth Guardians v. United States Office of Surface Mining, Reclam...
In WildEarth Guardians v. U.S. BLM, the District Court of Colorado showed that economic and developm...
In 2017, Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke issued a new order lifting the previous administration...
After President Trump’s Executive Order No. 13783 encouraging relaxing regulatory burdens on energy ...
In Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership v. Salazar, the United States District Court of Appea...
The United States District Court for the District of Montana granted Plaintiffs summary judgment aga...
To what extent must the BLM analyze potential climate change impacts where millions of acres of publ...
In Great Basin Resource Watch v. Bureau of Land Management, the Ninth Circuit invalidated the BLM’s ...
A federal court in Montana vacated the lease sale of several large oil and gas developments in Monta...
In Pit River Tribe v. Bureau of Land Management, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Ci...
WildEarth Guardians v. Zinke marks an important decision prompting the Bureau of Land Management to ...
As part of a comprehensive strategy to keep coal “in the ground,” environmental plaintiffs challenge...
In 2007, the Bureau of Land Management adopted a resource management plan that essentially made all ...
In Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone of Nevada v. United States Department of the Interior, the Nint...
In its second trip before the District Court of Montana, the Bull Mountain Mine expansion was again ...
The Colorado District Court in WildEarth Guardians v. United States Office of Surface Mining, Reclam...
In WildEarth Guardians v. U.S. BLM, the District Court of Colorado showed that economic and developm...
In 2017, Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke issued a new order lifting the previous administration...
After President Trump’s Executive Order No. 13783 encouraging relaxing regulatory burdens on energy ...
In Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership v. Salazar, the United States District Court of Appea...