A federal court in Montana vacated the lease sale of several large oil and gas developments in Montana and Wyoming because BLM’s revised guidance documents, which facilitated the lease sales, failed to prioritize development outside of sage-grouse habitat, as required by BLM land use plans. BLM adopted the prioritization requirement in 2015 as part of an effort to prevent the sage-grouse from being listed under the Endangered Species Act. The court held BLM violated the Federal Land Policy and Management Act when it essentially eliminated the prioritization requirement and approved the lease sales without properly amending the land use plans
In Great Basin Resource Watch v. Bureau of Land Management, the Ninth Circuit invalidated the BLM’s ...
In Oregon Natural Desert Association v. Jewell, the Ninth Circuit invalidated the BLM’s environmenta...
A federal district court vacated the U.S.’s largest offshore oil and gas lease sale ever because of ...
The United States District Court for the District of Montana granted Plaintiffs summary judgment aga...
The Montana Supreme Court did not issue any decisions in 2012 addressing oil and gas leasing or owne...
In its second trip before the District Court of Montana, the Bull Mountain Mine expansion was again ...
WildEarth Guardians v. Zinke marks an important decision prompting the Bureau of Land Management to ...
The Idaho District Court granted WWP’s motion for summary judgment and denied those of the BLM and i...
In Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership v. Salazar, the United States District Court of Appea...
Two environmental advocacy groups challenged the decision of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS...
Environmental activist and indigenous rights groups have challenged the validity of the Keystone XL ...
Landowners and conservation group brought suit against the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) over a pr...
Environmental plaintiffs demanded injunctions following U.S. Forest Service approval of two fuel red...
The United States Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that the U.S. Forest Service‟s proxy-on-proxy ...
In WildEarth Guardians v. U.S. BLM, the District Court of Colorado showed that economic and developm...
In Great Basin Resource Watch v. Bureau of Land Management, the Ninth Circuit invalidated the BLM’s ...
In Oregon Natural Desert Association v. Jewell, the Ninth Circuit invalidated the BLM’s environmenta...
A federal district court vacated the U.S.’s largest offshore oil and gas lease sale ever because of ...
The United States District Court for the District of Montana granted Plaintiffs summary judgment aga...
The Montana Supreme Court did not issue any decisions in 2012 addressing oil and gas leasing or owne...
In its second trip before the District Court of Montana, the Bull Mountain Mine expansion was again ...
WildEarth Guardians v. Zinke marks an important decision prompting the Bureau of Land Management to ...
The Idaho District Court granted WWP’s motion for summary judgment and denied those of the BLM and i...
In Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership v. Salazar, the United States District Court of Appea...
Two environmental advocacy groups challenged the decision of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS...
Environmental activist and indigenous rights groups have challenged the validity of the Keystone XL ...
Landowners and conservation group brought suit against the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) over a pr...
Environmental plaintiffs demanded injunctions following U.S. Forest Service approval of two fuel red...
The United States Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that the U.S. Forest Service‟s proxy-on-proxy ...
In WildEarth Guardians v. U.S. BLM, the District Court of Colorado showed that economic and developm...
In Great Basin Resource Watch v. Bureau of Land Management, the Ninth Circuit invalidated the BLM’s ...
In Oregon Natural Desert Association v. Jewell, the Ninth Circuit invalidated the BLM’s environmenta...
A federal district court vacated the U.S.’s largest offshore oil and gas lease sale ever because of ...