Add to ORKGWildearth Guardians v. United States Office of Surface Mining, Reclamation and Enforcement sprung from the approval of a modified mining plan for the Spring Creek Mine in Montana. Wildearth Guardians is the adoption of Magistrate Judge Ostby’s Findings and Recommendations by United States District Judge, Susan Watters concluding that the Office of Surface Mining, Reclamation and Enforcement violated several provisions of NEPA
A coalition of environmental advocacy groups challenged the U.S. Forest Service, U.S. Fish and Wildl...
In 1983, the EPA designated roughly 300 miles of polluted mining land near Butte, Montana, as a Supe...
To what extent must the BLM analyze potential climate change impacts where millions of acres of publ...
Wildearth Guardians v. United States Office of Surface Mining, Reclamation and Enforcement sprung fr...
The Colorado District Court in WildEarth Guardians v. United States Office of Surface Mining, Reclam...
In WildEarth Guardians v. U.S. BLM, the District Court of Colorado showed that economic and developm...
The United States District Court for the District of Montana granted Plaintiffs summary judgment aga...
As part of a comprehensive strategy to keep coal “in the ground,” environmental plaintiffs challenge...
In Great Basin Resource Watch v. Bureau of Land Management, the Ninth Circuit invalidated the BLM’s ...
In its second trip before the District Court of Montana, the Bull Mountain Mine expansion was again ...
WildEarth Guardians v. Zinke marks an important decision prompting the Bureau of Land Management to ...
In MEIC II, the Montana Supreme Court held MEIC’s claims regarding the extent of reclamation require...
Hecla Mining Company and its subsidiaries want to develop two industrial silver and copper mines––...
The Osage Nation, as owner of the beneficial interest in its mineral estate, issues federally-approv...
The body of case law construing the regulatory scheme of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation ...
A coalition of environmental advocacy groups challenged the U.S. Forest Service, U.S. Fish and Wildl...
In 1983, the EPA designated roughly 300 miles of polluted mining land near Butte, Montana, as a Supe...
To what extent must the BLM analyze potential climate change impacts where millions of acres of publ...
Wildearth Guardians v. United States Office of Surface Mining, Reclamation and Enforcement sprung fr...
The Colorado District Court in WildEarth Guardians v. United States Office of Surface Mining, Reclam...
In WildEarth Guardians v. U.S. BLM, the District Court of Colorado showed that economic and developm...
The United States District Court for the District of Montana granted Plaintiffs summary judgment aga...
As part of a comprehensive strategy to keep coal “in the ground,” environmental plaintiffs challenge...
In Great Basin Resource Watch v. Bureau of Land Management, the Ninth Circuit invalidated the BLM’s ...
In its second trip before the District Court of Montana, the Bull Mountain Mine expansion was again ...
WildEarth Guardians v. Zinke marks an important decision prompting the Bureau of Land Management to ...
In MEIC II, the Montana Supreme Court held MEIC’s claims regarding the extent of reclamation require...
Hecla Mining Company and its subsidiaries want to develop two industrial silver and copper mines––...
The Osage Nation, as owner of the beneficial interest in its mineral estate, issues federally-approv...
The body of case law construing the regulatory scheme of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation ...
A coalition of environmental advocacy groups challenged the U.S. Forest Service, U.S. Fish and Wildl...
In 1983, the EPA designated roughly 300 miles of polluted mining land near Butte, Montana, as a Supe...
To what extent must the BLM analyze potential climate change impacts where millions of acres of publ...