Add to ORKGTo what extent must the BLM analyze potential climate change impacts where millions of acres of public lands and federal mineral estates are being considered for coal development? Western Organization of Resource Councils v. BLM addresses this, setting the scope for NEPA-mandated environmental impact analysis and reasonable alternative consideration by federal agencies. Judge Brian Morris of the District of Montana eschewed BLM’s assertions that considering climate impacts would be speculative, instead requiring BLM to acknowledge scientific reality and include modern climate science in its NEPA review analysis
This Article reviews Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) completed in conjunction with Resource Ma...
In Oregon Natural Desert Association v. Jewell, the Ninth Circuit invalidated the BLM’s environmenta...
This paper describes how climate change will affect natural resources in the United States, and expl...
To what extent must the BLM analyze potential climate change impacts where millions of acres of publ...
The United States District Court for the District of Montana granted Plaintiffs summary judgment aga...
In WildEarth Guardians v. U.S. BLM, the District Court of Colorado showed that economic and developm...
In Great Basin Resource Watch v. Bureau of Land Management, the Ninth Circuit invalidated the BLM’s ...
WildEarth Guardians v. Zinke marks an important decision prompting the Bureau of Land Management to ...
In 2007, the Bureau of Land Management adopted a resource management plan that essentially made all ...
In Pit River Tribe v. Bureau of Land Management, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Ci...
Due to advances in climate science and an increased understanding of coal’s role as a greenhouse gas...
As part of a comprehensive strategy to keep coal “in the ground,” environmental plaintiffs challenge...
One of the most difficult challenges facing public land managers today is how to address climate cha...
Although natural resource managers are concerned about climate change, many are unable to adequately...
Environmental Law- NEPA- REGIONAL IMPACT STATEMENT IS NOT REQUIRED IN THE ABSENCE OF FORMAL PROPOSAL...
This Article reviews Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) completed in conjunction with Resource Ma...
In Oregon Natural Desert Association v. Jewell, the Ninth Circuit invalidated the BLM’s environmenta...
This paper describes how climate change will affect natural resources in the United States, and expl...
To what extent must the BLM analyze potential climate change impacts where millions of acres of publ...
The United States District Court for the District of Montana granted Plaintiffs summary judgment aga...
In WildEarth Guardians v. U.S. BLM, the District Court of Colorado showed that economic and developm...
In Great Basin Resource Watch v. Bureau of Land Management, the Ninth Circuit invalidated the BLM’s ...
WildEarth Guardians v. Zinke marks an important decision prompting the Bureau of Land Management to ...
In 2007, the Bureau of Land Management adopted a resource management plan that essentially made all ...
In Pit River Tribe v. Bureau of Land Management, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Ci...
Due to advances in climate science and an increased understanding of coal’s role as a greenhouse gas...
As part of a comprehensive strategy to keep coal “in the ground,” environmental plaintiffs challenge...
One of the most difficult challenges facing public land managers today is how to address climate cha...
Although natural resource managers are concerned about climate change, many are unable to adequately...
Environmental Law- NEPA- REGIONAL IMPACT STATEMENT IS NOT REQUIRED IN THE ABSENCE OF FORMAL PROPOSAL...
This Article reviews Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) completed in conjunction with Resource Ma...
In Oregon Natural Desert Association v. Jewell, the Ninth Circuit invalidated the BLM’s environmenta...
This paper describes how climate change will affect natural resources in the United States, and expl...