Add to ORKGFollowing the Sheff v. O’Neill school desegregation case ruling in 1996, inter-district magnet schools became a remedy to reduce racial and economic isolation in Hartford, Connecticut’s public schools. This social psychology study explores the hypothesis that participation in an inter-district magnet school, whose purpose is to be racially integrated, promotes positive inter-racial attitudes among students as well as reducing negative attitude
Following the result of the Connecticut Supreme Court case Sheff v. O’Neill, Interdistrict Magnet Sc...
This study uses macrostructural theory, contact theory, and group threat theory to examine how schoo...
The Open Choice Program in Hartford, Connecticut resulted from a ruling by the Connecticut Supreme C...
Following the Sheff v. O’Neill school desegregation case ruling in 1996, inter-district magnet schoo...
Following the Sheff v. O’Neill school desegregation case in Hartford, Connecticut, the state increas...
Magnet schools appear to be one alternative to the question of how society can desegregate the publi...
Based on interview and documents, this case study explores the implementation of the Learning Corrid...
The purpose of this case study is to examine the effect of court-mandated busing for racial/ethnic e...
This observational case study explores how an interdistrict magnet school strives to use the Montess...
This study examines the effects of school desegregation on levels of prejudice. Before the study beg...
This study combines spatial analysis and door-to-door interviews to explore how three factors – scho...
This policy analysis focuses on interdistrict magnet schools, the factors that lead parents to apply...
This policy analysis explores Connecticut\u27s legal responsibilities and funding of interdistrict m...
The purpose of this study was to provide an analysis of the desegregation plan of the elementary sch...
Many educational policy leaders in Connecticut have focused on magnet schools as one of the primary ...
Following the result of the Connecticut Supreme Court case Sheff v. O’Neill, Interdistrict Magnet Sc...
This study uses macrostructural theory, contact theory, and group threat theory to examine how schoo...
The Open Choice Program in Hartford, Connecticut resulted from a ruling by the Connecticut Supreme C...
Following the Sheff v. O’Neill school desegregation case ruling in 1996, inter-district magnet schoo...
Following the Sheff v. O’Neill school desegregation case in Hartford, Connecticut, the state increas...
Magnet schools appear to be one alternative to the question of how society can desegregate the publi...
Based on interview and documents, this case study explores the implementation of the Learning Corrid...
The purpose of this case study is to examine the effect of court-mandated busing for racial/ethnic e...
This observational case study explores how an interdistrict magnet school strives to use the Montess...
This study examines the effects of school desegregation on levels of prejudice. Before the study beg...
This study combines spatial analysis and door-to-door interviews to explore how three factors – scho...
This policy analysis focuses on interdistrict magnet schools, the factors that lead parents to apply...
This policy analysis explores Connecticut\u27s legal responsibilities and funding of interdistrict m...
The purpose of this study was to provide an analysis of the desegregation plan of the elementary sch...
Many educational policy leaders in Connecticut have focused on magnet schools as one of the primary ...
Following the result of the Connecticut Supreme Court case Sheff v. O’Neill, Interdistrict Magnet Sc...
This study uses macrostructural theory, contact theory, and group threat theory to examine how schoo...
The Open Choice Program in Hartford, Connecticut resulted from a ruling by the Connecticut Supreme C...