Many educational policy leaders in Connecticut have focused on magnet schools as one of the primary remedies in the Sheff vs. O’Neill Court case. The purpose of magnet schools is to reduce racial and socio-economic isolation and provide an equal educational opportunity for all of Connecticut’s children. The Connecticut Supreme Court found that de facto segregation exists in Connecticut and that this violates the state constitution. Research has shown the importance of socio-economic integration as a strategy to improve educational outcomes of low-income children (Coleman
Based on interview and documents, this case study explores the implementation of the Learning Corrid...
Little is known about the influence of school choice programs on race and economic segregation i pub...
the state of Connecticut was responsible for de facto segregation in the state’s schools and that th...
This policy analysis focuses on interdistrict magnet schools, the factors that lead parents to apply...
This policy analysis explores Connecticut\u27s legal responsibilities and funding of interdistrict m...
Following the result of the Connecticut Supreme Court case Sheff v. O’Neill, Interdistrict Magnet Sc...
Following the Sheff v. O’Neill school desegregation case ruling in 1996, inter-district magnet schoo...
Following the Sheff v. O’Neill school desegregation case in Hartford, Connecticut, the state increas...
Magnet schools appear to be one alternative to the question of how society can desegregate the publi...
This is a study of desegregation and quality education, issues of increasing concern in Hartford, Co...
Integration scholars measure the positive and negative effects of integration policy on school distr...
Hartford Open Choice Students’ School Engagement: The Role of Individual Characteristics and School ...
This mixed methods case study explores the role of magnet schools as a vehicle to promote integratio...
This study combines spatial analysis and door-to-door interviews to explore how three factors – scho...
Using evidence from Durham, North Carolina, we examine the impact of school choice programs on racia...
Based on interview and documents, this case study explores the implementation of the Learning Corrid...
Little is known about the influence of school choice programs on race and economic segregation i pub...
the state of Connecticut was responsible for de facto segregation in the state’s schools and that th...
This policy analysis focuses on interdistrict magnet schools, the factors that lead parents to apply...
This policy analysis explores Connecticut\u27s legal responsibilities and funding of interdistrict m...
Following the result of the Connecticut Supreme Court case Sheff v. O’Neill, Interdistrict Magnet Sc...
Following the Sheff v. O’Neill school desegregation case ruling in 1996, inter-district magnet schoo...
Following the Sheff v. O’Neill school desegregation case in Hartford, Connecticut, the state increas...
Magnet schools appear to be one alternative to the question of how society can desegregate the publi...
This is a study of desegregation and quality education, issues of increasing concern in Hartford, Co...
Integration scholars measure the positive and negative effects of integration policy on school distr...
Hartford Open Choice Students’ School Engagement: The Role of Individual Characteristics and School ...
This mixed methods case study explores the role of magnet schools as a vehicle to promote integratio...
This study combines spatial analysis and door-to-door interviews to explore how three factors – scho...
Using evidence from Durham, North Carolina, we examine the impact of school choice programs on racia...
Based on interview and documents, this case study explores the implementation of the Learning Corrid...
Little is known about the influence of school choice programs on race and economic segregation i pub...
the state of Connecticut was responsible for de facto segregation in the state’s schools and that th...