Add to ORKGThe Court determined that the word “resides” in NRS 205.067(5)(b) does not require that the owner of a dwelling live permanently or continuously in the dwelling. The Court also held that the sentence of a maximum of 96 months in prison with parole eligibility after 38 months imposed on the appellant when a jury convicted him of home invasion, was not cruel and unusual punishment
The Court confronted several issues in this methodical decision. The Court addressed standing and di...
The Court clarified the ambiguity of the meaning “territorial jurisdiction,” a term of art found in ...
The Court affirmed the district court’s decision and held that the prosecutorial consent provision i...
The Court determined that the word “resides” in NRS 205.067(5)(b) does not require that the owner of...
The Supreme Court determined that the plain language of NRS 213.1243 does not grant the State Board ...
In an opinion drafted by Justice Parraguirre, the Nevada Supreme Court re-evaluated its long holding...
NRS § 209.4465 does not allow for good time served to be credited for those who commit child lewdnes...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered whether an offender must serve the minimum term of his or her se...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered whether an offender must serve the minimum term of his or her se...
In an opinion drafted by Justice Parraguirre, the Nevada Supreme Court re-evaluated its long holding...
The Court reaffirmed its holding in Kuykendall v. State, interpreting NRS 176.055(1) to require sent...
The Court determined that (1) the state of Nevada has territorial jurisdiction under NRS 171.020 whe...
In light of recent statutes limiting the right to bear arms for people convicted of misdemeanor batt...
The Nevada Supreme Court determined that a judgment of conviction, pursuant to a jury verdict, of on...
Applying the rule of lenity, the Nevada Supreme Court found that a convicted felon in possession of ...
The Court confronted several issues in this methodical decision. The Court addressed standing and di...
The Court clarified the ambiguity of the meaning “territorial jurisdiction,” a term of art found in ...
The Court affirmed the district court’s decision and held that the prosecutorial consent provision i...
The Court determined that the word “resides” in NRS 205.067(5)(b) does not require that the owner of...
The Supreme Court determined that the plain language of NRS 213.1243 does not grant the State Board ...
In an opinion drafted by Justice Parraguirre, the Nevada Supreme Court re-evaluated its long holding...
NRS § 209.4465 does not allow for good time served to be credited for those who commit child lewdnes...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered whether an offender must serve the minimum term of his or her se...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered whether an offender must serve the minimum term of his or her se...
In an opinion drafted by Justice Parraguirre, the Nevada Supreme Court re-evaluated its long holding...
The Court reaffirmed its holding in Kuykendall v. State, interpreting NRS 176.055(1) to require sent...
The Court determined that (1) the state of Nevada has territorial jurisdiction under NRS 171.020 whe...
In light of recent statutes limiting the right to bear arms for people convicted of misdemeanor batt...
The Nevada Supreme Court determined that a judgment of conviction, pursuant to a jury verdict, of on...
Applying the rule of lenity, the Nevada Supreme Court found that a convicted felon in possession of ...
The Court confronted several issues in this methodical decision. The Court addressed standing and di...
The Court clarified the ambiguity of the meaning “territorial jurisdiction,” a term of art found in ...
The Court affirmed the district court’s decision and held that the prosecutorial consent provision i...