Add to ORKGIn light of recent statutes limiting the right to bear arms for people convicted of misdemeanor battery constituting domestic violence, the Court determined that because the Legislature reclassified misdemeanor battery in that context to constitute a serious offense, those convicted of it are entitled to a jury trial
The Court reaffirmed its holding in Kuykendall v. State, interpreting NRS 176.055(1) to require sent...
The Court overruled precedent which held that a presumption of vindictiveness applies when a judge i...
The Court determined that (1) the challenge-to-fight theory under NRS 200.450 is not vague and overb...
In light of recent statutes limiting the right to bear arms for people convicted of misdemeanor batt...
The Court held that the district court abused its discretion when overturning a misdemeanor driving ...
The Court determined that when the State allows a defendant to plead guilty to a first offense domes...
The Court affirmed the district court’s decision and held that the prosecutorial consent provision i...
The Court concluded that (1) the empanelment of an anonymous jury does not, without actual prejudice...
The Nevada Supreme Court determined that a judgment of conviction, pursuant to a jury verdict, of on...
The Court concluded that double jeopardy did not prohibit the appellant’s retrial because he had imp...
The Court considered a petition for a writ of mandamus challenging an order from the district court ...
Domestic violence is a global issue, but in the United States it is especially lethal. Hundreds of ...
The Court determined that the trial judge’s actions during jury selection rose to the level of judic...
A complaint was made in the Municipal Court of Hoboken against the defendant charging that he had wi...
The Court held that a party waives the right challenge a juror’s presence on appeal when the argumen...
The Court reaffirmed its holding in Kuykendall v. State, interpreting NRS 176.055(1) to require sent...
The Court overruled precedent which held that a presumption of vindictiveness applies when a judge i...
The Court determined that (1) the challenge-to-fight theory under NRS 200.450 is not vague and overb...
In light of recent statutes limiting the right to bear arms for people convicted of misdemeanor batt...
The Court held that the district court abused its discretion when overturning a misdemeanor driving ...
The Court determined that when the State allows a defendant to plead guilty to a first offense domes...
The Court affirmed the district court’s decision and held that the prosecutorial consent provision i...
The Court concluded that (1) the empanelment of an anonymous jury does not, without actual prejudice...
The Nevada Supreme Court determined that a judgment of conviction, pursuant to a jury verdict, of on...
The Court concluded that double jeopardy did not prohibit the appellant’s retrial because he had imp...
The Court considered a petition for a writ of mandamus challenging an order from the district court ...
Domestic violence is a global issue, but in the United States it is especially lethal. Hundreds of ...
The Court determined that the trial judge’s actions during jury selection rose to the level of judic...
A complaint was made in the Municipal Court of Hoboken against the defendant charging that he had wi...
The Court held that a party waives the right challenge a juror’s presence on appeal when the argumen...
The Court reaffirmed its holding in Kuykendall v. State, interpreting NRS 176.055(1) to require sent...
The Court overruled precedent which held that a presumption of vindictiveness applies when a judge i...
The Court determined that (1) the challenge-to-fight theory under NRS 200.450 is not vague and overb...