Add to ORKGThe Court concluded that (1) the empanelment of an anonymous jury does not, without actual prejudice, infringe on a defendant’s constitutional rights and the district court satisfied the abuse-of-discretion standard adopted; (2) the district court need not instruct a jury that is responsible for imposing a sentence in a first-degree murder case under NRS 175.552 about the effects of a deadly weapon enhancement; and (3) there was no abuse of discretion in the district court’s decision to admit Menendez-Cordero’s threats as consciousness-of-guilt evidence
Martinez Guzman was indicted by a grand jury for five burglaries and four murders occurring in two c...
The Court concluded that double jeopardy did not prohibit the appellant’s retrial because he had imp...
In light of recent statutes limiting the right to bear arms for people convicted of misdemeanor batt...
The Court determined although the district court has broad discretion to settle jury instructions, t...
The Court held that a party waives the right challenge a juror’s presence on appeal when the argumen...
The Court determined that the trial judge’s actions during jury selection rose to the level of judic...
The Court determined that (1) a defendant is death-eligible in Nevada once the State proves beyond a...
The Court overruled precedent which held that a presumption of vindictiveness applies when a judge i...
The Court determined that (1) Appellant’s motion for a new trial complied with the provisions of NRS...
The Court determined that (1) the challenge-to-fight theory under NRS 200.450 is not vague and overb...
The Court determined that a defendant is not entitled to cross examine examiners who find him incomp...
The Nevada Supreme Court determined that a judgment of conviction, pursuant to a jury verdict, of on...
The Court reviewed an appeal from a defendant who was convicted of seven sexually related counts. Th...
The Court affirmed Lyons v. State, which gives the courts discretion to reject a defendant’s request...
The Court determined that (1) the state of Nevada has territorial jurisdiction under NRS 171.020 whe...
Martinez Guzman was indicted by a grand jury for five burglaries and four murders occurring in two c...
The Court concluded that double jeopardy did not prohibit the appellant’s retrial because he had imp...
In light of recent statutes limiting the right to bear arms for people convicted of misdemeanor batt...
The Court determined although the district court has broad discretion to settle jury instructions, t...
The Court held that a party waives the right challenge a juror’s presence on appeal when the argumen...
The Court determined that the trial judge’s actions during jury selection rose to the level of judic...
The Court determined that (1) a defendant is death-eligible in Nevada once the State proves beyond a...
The Court overruled precedent which held that a presumption of vindictiveness applies when a judge i...
The Court determined that (1) Appellant’s motion for a new trial complied with the provisions of NRS...
The Court determined that (1) the challenge-to-fight theory under NRS 200.450 is not vague and overb...
The Court determined that a defendant is not entitled to cross examine examiners who find him incomp...
The Nevada Supreme Court determined that a judgment of conviction, pursuant to a jury verdict, of on...
The Court reviewed an appeal from a defendant who was convicted of seven sexually related counts. Th...
The Court affirmed Lyons v. State, which gives the courts discretion to reject a defendant’s request...
The Court determined that (1) the state of Nevada has territorial jurisdiction under NRS 171.020 whe...
Martinez Guzman was indicted by a grand jury for five burglaries and four murders occurring in two c...
The Court concluded that double jeopardy did not prohibit the appellant’s retrial because he had imp...
In light of recent statutes limiting the right to bear arms for people convicted of misdemeanor batt...