Add to ORKGThe Supreme Court determined that the plain language of NRS 213.1243 does not grant the State Board of Parole Commissioners authority to impose additional conditions not enumerated in the statute when supervising sex offenders on lifetime supervision
The Supreme Court of Nevada considered whether the appellant Antonio Aldape could challenge the cond...
The Court invoked its supervisory powers and adopted a rule of admissibility to limit the use of a p...
The Court invoked its supervisory powers and adopted a rule of admissibility to limit the use of a p...
The Supreme Court determined that the plain language of NRS 213.1243 does not grant the State Board ...
The Court considered whether Assembly Bill 579, which required mandatory registration for juveniles ...
The Court determined whether a person who is serving a sentence of lifetime supervision may challeng...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered whether an offender must serve the minimum term of his or her se...
The Court affirmed the district court’s decision and held that the prosecutorial consent provision i...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered whether an offender must serve the minimum term of his or her se...
The Court confronted several issues in this methodical decision. The Court addressed standing and di...
The Nevada Parole Board can deny parole for any reason authorized by regulation or statute. However,...
The Nevada Supreme Court affirmed the district court’s order dismissing Floyd’s complaint which chal...
The Nevada Supreme Court held that the juvenile court properly certified a juvenile as an adult beca...
NRS § 209.4465 does not allow for good time served to be credited for those who commit child lewdnes...
The Court determined that the word “resides” in NRS 205.067(5)(b) does not require that the owner of...
The Supreme Court of Nevada considered whether the appellant Antonio Aldape could challenge the cond...
The Court invoked its supervisory powers and adopted a rule of admissibility to limit the use of a p...
The Court invoked its supervisory powers and adopted a rule of admissibility to limit the use of a p...
The Supreme Court determined that the plain language of NRS 213.1243 does not grant the State Board ...
The Court considered whether Assembly Bill 579, which required mandatory registration for juveniles ...
The Court determined whether a person who is serving a sentence of lifetime supervision may challeng...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered whether an offender must serve the minimum term of his or her se...
The Court affirmed the district court’s decision and held that the prosecutorial consent provision i...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered whether an offender must serve the minimum term of his or her se...
The Court confronted several issues in this methodical decision. The Court addressed standing and di...
The Nevada Parole Board can deny parole for any reason authorized by regulation or statute. However,...
The Nevada Supreme Court affirmed the district court’s order dismissing Floyd’s complaint which chal...
The Nevada Supreme Court held that the juvenile court properly certified a juvenile as an adult beca...
NRS § 209.4465 does not allow for good time served to be credited for those who commit child lewdnes...
The Court determined that the word “resides” in NRS 205.067(5)(b) does not require that the owner of...
The Supreme Court of Nevada considered whether the appellant Antonio Aldape could challenge the cond...
The Court invoked its supervisory powers and adopted a rule of admissibility to limit the use of a p...
The Court invoked its supervisory powers and adopted a rule of admissibility to limit the use of a p...