Topics
NevadaPlace
The Court clarified the ambiguity of the meaning “territorial jurisdiction,” a term of art found in NRS 172.105. The Court held that NRS 172.105 incorporates Nevada’s venue statutes and grants a grand jury the authority to “inquire into a [criminal] offense so long as the district court that empaneled the grand jury may appropriately adjudicate the defendant’s guilt for that particular offense.
The definition of “victim” under Article 1, Section 8A of the Nevada Constitution (a.k.a. Marsy’s La...
In answering the rephrased certified question from the Ninth Circuit, this Court ultimately conclude...
In answering the rephrased certified question from the Ninth Circuit, this Court ultimately conclude...
Martinez Guzman was indicted by a grand jury for five burglaries and four murders occurring in two c...
Martinez Guzman was indicted by a grand jury for five burglaries and four murders occurring in two c...
The Court determined that (1) the state of Nevada has territorial jurisdiction under NRS 171.020 whe...
Applying the rule of lenity, the Nevada Supreme Court found that a convicted felon in possession of ...
The Court affirmed the district court’s decision and held that the prosecutorial consent provision i...
The Court concluded that double jeopardy did not prohibit the appellant’s retrial because he had imp...
The Court determined that when the State allows a defendant to plead guilty to a first offense domes...
The Nevada Supreme Court determined that (1) if collateral consequences of a criminal conviction exi...
In considering whether the district court has subject matter jurisdiction over felonious acts commit...
The Court considered a petition for a writ of mandamus challenging an order from the district court ...
The Nevada Supreme Court determined that a judgment of conviction, pursuant to a jury verdict, of on...
The Court held that jury instructions must be aligned with a Nevada statute if the Nevada statute ha...
The definition of “victim” under Article 1, Section 8A of the Nevada Constitution (a.k.a. Marsy’s La...
In answering the rephrased certified question from the Ninth Circuit, this Court ultimately conclude...
In answering the rephrased certified question from the Ninth Circuit, this Court ultimately conclude...
Martinez Guzman was indicted by a grand jury for five burglaries and four murders occurring in two c...
Martinez Guzman was indicted by a grand jury for five burglaries and four murders occurring in two c...
The Court determined that (1) the state of Nevada has territorial jurisdiction under NRS 171.020 whe...
Applying the rule of lenity, the Nevada Supreme Court found that a convicted felon in possession of ...
The Court affirmed the district court’s decision and held that the prosecutorial consent provision i...
The Court concluded that double jeopardy did not prohibit the appellant’s retrial because he had imp...
The Court determined that when the State allows a defendant to plead guilty to a first offense domes...
The Nevada Supreme Court determined that (1) if collateral consequences of a criminal conviction exi...
In considering whether the district court has subject matter jurisdiction over felonious acts commit...
The Court considered a petition for a writ of mandamus challenging an order from the district court ...
The Nevada Supreme Court determined that a judgment of conviction, pursuant to a jury verdict, of on...
The Court held that jury instructions must be aligned with a Nevada statute if the Nevada statute ha...
The definition of “victim” under Article 1, Section 8A of the Nevada Constitution (a.k.a. Marsy’s La...
In answering the rephrased certified question from the Ninth Circuit, this Court ultimately conclude...
In answering the rephrased certified question from the Ninth Circuit, this Court ultimately conclude...
Add to ORKG