Add to ORKGIn considering whether the district court has subject matter jurisdiction over felonious acts committed by minors who avoid charges until adulthood, the Supreme Court ruled that juvenile courts have exclusive jurisdiction over delinquent acts unless otherwise provided under NRS 62B.335
The Court affirmed the district court’s decision and held that the prosecutorial consent provision i...
Petitioner, a fourteen-year-old girl, was charged with murder in the first degree in the county cour...
The Court determined, pursuant to the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, as well as Article ...
The Supreme Court of Nevada addressed the exception to the category A felony designation for lewdnes...
The Nevada Supreme Court held that the juvenile court properly certified a juvenile as an adult beca...
The Court considered whether Assembly Bill 579, which required mandatory registration for juveniles ...
NRS 62C.240 is triggered when circumstances surrounding a juvenile’s arrest plainly demonstrate that...
The Court determined that (1) a district court must perform a comprehensive three-step analysis when...
The Court held that the plain language of NRS § 200.310(1) cannot be interpreted to mean that an adu...
The Court clarified the ambiguity of the meaning “territorial jurisdiction,” a term of art found in ...
The Supreme Court determined that the plain language of NRS 213.1243 does not grant the State Board ...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered whether the district court erred in dismissing the criminal comp...
Martinez Guzman was indicted by a grand jury for five burglaries and four murders occurring in two c...
The Court determined that (1) the state of Nevada has territorial jurisdiction under NRS 171.020 whe...
The Nevada Supreme Court held that (1) under NRS 200.710(2), knowingly using a minor as the subject ...
The Court affirmed the district court’s decision and held that the prosecutorial consent provision i...
Petitioner, a fourteen-year-old girl, was charged with murder in the first degree in the county cour...
The Court determined, pursuant to the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, as well as Article ...
The Supreme Court of Nevada addressed the exception to the category A felony designation for lewdnes...
The Nevada Supreme Court held that the juvenile court properly certified a juvenile as an adult beca...
The Court considered whether Assembly Bill 579, which required mandatory registration for juveniles ...
NRS 62C.240 is triggered when circumstances surrounding a juvenile’s arrest plainly demonstrate that...
The Court determined that (1) a district court must perform a comprehensive three-step analysis when...
The Court held that the plain language of NRS § 200.310(1) cannot be interpreted to mean that an adu...
The Court clarified the ambiguity of the meaning “territorial jurisdiction,” a term of art found in ...
The Supreme Court determined that the plain language of NRS 213.1243 does not grant the State Board ...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered whether the district court erred in dismissing the criminal comp...
Martinez Guzman was indicted by a grand jury for five burglaries and four murders occurring in two c...
The Court determined that (1) the state of Nevada has territorial jurisdiction under NRS 171.020 whe...
The Nevada Supreme Court held that (1) under NRS 200.710(2), knowingly using a minor as the subject ...
The Court affirmed the district court’s decision and held that the prosecutorial consent provision i...
Petitioner, a fourteen-year-old girl, was charged with murder in the first degree in the county cour...
The Court determined, pursuant to the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, as well as Article ...