Add to ORKGThe Court determined that the word “resides” in NRS 205.067(5)(b) does not require that the owner of a dwelling live permanently or continuously in the dwelling. The Court also held that the sentence of a maximum of 96 months in prison with parole eligibility after 38 months imposed on the appellant when a jury convicted him of home invasion, was not cruel and unusual punishment
The Court reaffirmed its holding in Kuykendall v. State, interpreting NRS 176.055(1) to require sent...
In Reid v. Wetzel, a class action lawsuit was filed against the Pennsylvania\u27s Department of Corr...
As it stands at the time of writing, Clause 145 of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offen...
The Court determined that the word “resides” in NRS 205.067(5)(b) does not require that the owner of...
The Court determined that pursuant to NRS 176.035(1), a district court must pronounce aggregate mini...
The Supreme Court determined that the plain language of NRS 213.1243 does not grant the State Board ...
The United States Supreme Court has held that a sentence of life imprisonment without parole imposed...
In an opinion drafted by Justice Cadish, the Court considered whether Nevada’s homestead exemption p...
In an opinion drafted by Justice Cadish, the Court considered whether Nevada’s homestead exemption p...
Article 26 of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights, which prohibits “cruel or unusual punishments...
The provisions of criminal proceedings do not clearly define what is meant by ”domicile” when they p...
NRS § 209.4465 does not allow for good time served to be credited for those who commit child lewdnes...
In an opinion drafted by Justice Parraguirre, the Nevada Supreme Court re-evaluated its long holding...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that a mandatory life sentence imposed under a state...
In 2015, the Supreme Court struck down the residual clause of a major federal habitual offender st...
The Court reaffirmed its holding in Kuykendall v. State, interpreting NRS 176.055(1) to require sent...
In Reid v. Wetzel, a class action lawsuit was filed against the Pennsylvania\u27s Department of Corr...
As it stands at the time of writing, Clause 145 of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offen...
The Court determined that the word “resides” in NRS 205.067(5)(b) does not require that the owner of...
The Court determined that pursuant to NRS 176.035(1), a district court must pronounce aggregate mini...
The Supreme Court determined that the plain language of NRS 213.1243 does not grant the State Board ...
The United States Supreme Court has held that a sentence of life imprisonment without parole imposed...
In an opinion drafted by Justice Cadish, the Court considered whether Nevada’s homestead exemption p...
In an opinion drafted by Justice Cadish, the Court considered whether Nevada’s homestead exemption p...
Article 26 of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights, which prohibits “cruel or unusual punishments...
The provisions of criminal proceedings do not clearly define what is meant by ”domicile” when they p...
NRS § 209.4465 does not allow for good time served to be credited for those who commit child lewdnes...
In an opinion drafted by Justice Parraguirre, the Nevada Supreme Court re-evaluated its long holding...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that a mandatory life sentence imposed under a state...
In 2015, the Supreme Court struck down the residual clause of a major federal habitual offender st...
The Court reaffirmed its holding in Kuykendall v. State, interpreting NRS 176.055(1) to require sent...
In Reid v. Wetzel, a class action lawsuit was filed against the Pennsylvania\u27s Department of Corr...
As it stands at the time of writing, Clause 145 of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offen...