<p>A) PCoA of the unweighted UniFrac distances of microbial 16S rRNA sequences, B) Taxonomic richness as measured by number of species observed, C) LEfSe-derived phylogenetic tree depicting nodes within the bacterial taxonomic hierarchy that are significantly enriched in cecal samples from HF (red) and HF + nopal (green) rats. Significant phyla are labeled with the genera in parentheses. LEfSe was used with default parameters. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 5 per group). Values are significantly different * P < 0.05.</p
<p>Plots illustrate correlations between the biomarkers (brown stars) and the gut microbiota (circle...
<p>Taxonomy compositions: (A) phylum and (B) family levels are shown. Genomic DNA was extracted from...
<p>ANOSIM of gut bacterial abundance data was used to generate a permutated Global R statistic (R) a...
<p>(A) Taxonomic representation of statistically and biologically consistent differences between hea...
<p>(A) Differences are represented in the color of the most abundant group. (B) The left histogram s...
<p>(A) healthy rats, (B) CRC rats. Histogram represents the relative abundance of bacterial phyla in...
<p>(a) DGGE profiles of fecal bacteria in rats from the different groups. Sample numbers above lanes...
Fermentation differs between the proximal and distal gut but little is known regarding how the bacte...
<p>The bar plot shows how the caecal microbiota distribution of each sample changes in rats of the v...
a. Diets within fecal sample type, b. Diets within rumen liquor sample type, c. Fecal and rumen liqu...
<p>(A) Histogram of proportional changes in gut microbiota OTU abundance at the L3 level after14 day...
<p>(A) PCoA score plot based on unweighted UniFrac metrics. Each point represents the mean principal...
HT–high threshold, low-excitable intact rats; LT–low threshold, high-excitable intact rats; n = 18 i...
<p>Effects of GpS on fecal microbiome in nonxenograft (A-C) and xenograft (D-F) nude mice. Data are ...
Table S2. Data production, quality control, assembly result and gene prediction resulted from fecal ...
<p>Plots illustrate correlations between the biomarkers (brown stars) and the gut microbiota (circle...
<p>Taxonomy compositions: (A) phylum and (B) family levels are shown. Genomic DNA was extracted from...
<p>ANOSIM of gut bacterial abundance data was used to generate a permutated Global R statistic (R) a...
<p>(A) Taxonomic representation of statistically and biologically consistent differences between hea...
<p>(A) Differences are represented in the color of the most abundant group. (B) The left histogram s...
<p>(A) healthy rats, (B) CRC rats. Histogram represents the relative abundance of bacterial phyla in...
<p>(a) DGGE profiles of fecal bacteria in rats from the different groups. Sample numbers above lanes...
Fermentation differs between the proximal and distal gut but little is known regarding how the bacte...
<p>The bar plot shows how the caecal microbiota distribution of each sample changes in rats of the v...
a. Diets within fecal sample type, b. Diets within rumen liquor sample type, c. Fecal and rumen liqu...
<p>(A) Histogram of proportional changes in gut microbiota OTU abundance at the L3 level after14 day...
<p>(A) PCoA score plot based on unweighted UniFrac metrics. Each point represents the mean principal...
HT–high threshold, low-excitable intact rats; LT–low threshold, high-excitable intact rats; n = 18 i...
<p>Effects of GpS on fecal microbiome in nonxenograft (A-C) and xenograft (D-F) nude mice. Data are ...
Table S2. Data production, quality control, assembly result and gene prediction resulted from fecal ...
<p>Plots illustrate correlations between the biomarkers (brown stars) and the gut microbiota (circle...
<p>Taxonomy compositions: (A) phylum and (B) family levels are shown. Genomic DNA was extracted from...
<p>ANOSIM of gut bacterial abundance data was used to generate a permutated Global R statistic (R) a...