HT–high threshold, low-excitable intact rats; LT–low threshold, high-excitable intact rats; n = 18 in each group; the graphs represent the mean and SEM **p<0.01 *p<0.05, unpaired t-test.</p
<p>Abbreviations: CGS, control group stool; TGS, tumor group stool. Relative contribution of a phylu...
<p>A, Shannon’s diversity indices of bacterial populations in Charles River (CR, n = 58) and Harlan ...
<p>Plots illustrate correlations between the biomarkers (brown stars) and the gut microbiota (circle...
HT–high threshold, low-excitable rats; LT–low threshold, high-excitable rats; control–rats without s...
<p>(A) Taxonomic representation of statistically and biologically consistent differences between hea...
<p>(A) healthy rats, (B) CRC rats. Histogram represents the relative abundance of bacterial phyla in...
HT–high threshold, low-excitable rats; LT–low threshold, high-excitable rats; 0, 7, 24 –days after t...
HT—animals with high excitability threshold (n = 32), LT–animals with low excitability threshold (n ...
The horizontal axis on panel A shows the animals of the control groups at the corresponding time aft...
<p>(a) DGGE profiles of fecal bacteria in rats from the different groups. Sample numbers above lanes...
a, b, c<p>Mean values within a column with different superscript letters were significantly differen...
<p>(A) Differences are represented in the color of the most abundant group. (B) The left histogram s...
a<p>Refers to the frequency (and percent) of each unique bacteria genus in the ABA or Control ABA or...
Supplemental information for manuscript on the relationship between the gut microbiome and both meta...
<p>The bar plot shows how the caecal microbiota distribution of each sample changes in rats of the v...
<p>Abbreviations: CGS, control group stool; TGS, tumor group stool. Relative contribution of a phylu...
<p>A, Shannon’s diversity indices of bacterial populations in Charles River (CR, n = 58) and Harlan ...
<p>Plots illustrate correlations between the biomarkers (brown stars) and the gut microbiota (circle...
HT–high threshold, low-excitable rats; LT–low threshold, high-excitable rats; control–rats without s...
<p>(A) Taxonomic representation of statistically and biologically consistent differences between hea...
<p>(A) healthy rats, (B) CRC rats. Histogram represents the relative abundance of bacterial phyla in...
HT–high threshold, low-excitable rats; LT–low threshold, high-excitable rats; 0, 7, 24 –days after t...
HT—animals with high excitability threshold (n = 32), LT–animals with low excitability threshold (n ...
The horizontal axis on panel A shows the animals of the control groups at the corresponding time aft...
<p>(a) DGGE profiles of fecal bacteria in rats from the different groups. Sample numbers above lanes...
a, b, c<p>Mean values within a column with different superscript letters were significantly differen...
<p>(A) Differences are represented in the color of the most abundant group. (B) The left histogram s...
a<p>Refers to the frequency (and percent) of each unique bacteria genus in the ABA or Control ABA or...
Supplemental information for manuscript on the relationship between the gut microbiome and both meta...
<p>The bar plot shows how the caecal microbiota distribution of each sample changes in rats of the v...
<p>Abbreviations: CGS, control group stool; TGS, tumor group stool. Relative contribution of a phylu...
<p>A, Shannon’s diversity indices of bacterial populations in Charles River (CR, n = 58) and Harlan ...
<p>Plots illustrate correlations between the biomarkers (brown stars) and the gut microbiota (circle...