a<p>Refers to the frequency (and percent) of each unique bacteria genus in the ABA or Control ABA or exercise or ad libitum group.</p><p>"n" number of bands cloned, sequenced and identified in each rat group.</p><p>N = 10 rats per group. Barnard's exact unconditional test was used to compare the proportions of one group of rats to each other.</p><p>Values in a row with different superscript letters are significantly different <i>P</i><0.05.</p
HT–high threshold, low-excitable rats; LT–low threshold, high-excitable rats; control–rats without s...
<p>Superscript letters across rows denote significant difference at P<0.05 determined using Mann Whi...
<p>Note:</p>a<p><i>P</i><0.01 compared to group C;</p>b<p><i>P</i><0.01 compared to group H;</p>c<p>...
<p>Values are presented as means ± SD and expressed as log<sub>10</sub> 16S rRNA gene copies/gram of...
<p>(a) DGGE profiles of fecal bacteria in rats from the different groups. Sample numbers above lanes...
<p>The relative quantity of specific groups of bacteria was determined by real-time PCR of 16S rRNA ...
<p>*Results are represented as means±SEM and depict the percent of the respective bacterial group/ge...
<p>A, Shannon’s diversity indices of bacterial populations in Charles River (CR, n = 58) and Harlan ...
HT–high threshold, low-excitable intact rats; LT–low threshold, high-excitable intact rats; n = 18 i...
<p>Bacterial DNA expressed as log genome equivalents/Ml.</p><p>n = number of samples where the bact...
<p>A Distribution of NEC scores in Charles River (solid bars) and Harlan Labs (open bars) rats. B, N...
(A)% of bacteria at genus level in the control and AA groups. Results are presented as the percentag...
a, b, c<p>Mean values within a column with different superscript letters were significantly differen...
<p>CPT-11 injections were carried out on day 1, 2, and 3 of the experiment (see <a href="http://www....
<p>(A) healthy rats, (B) CRC rats. Histogram represents the relative abundance of bacterial phyla in...
HT–high threshold, low-excitable rats; LT–low threshold, high-excitable rats; control–rats without s...
<p>Superscript letters across rows denote significant difference at P<0.05 determined using Mann Whi...
<p>Note:</p>a<p><i>P</i><0.01 compared to group C;</p>b<p><i>P</i><0.01 compared to group H;</p>c<p>...
<p>Values are presented as means ± SD and expressed as log<sub>10</sub> 16S rRNA gene copies/gram of...
<p>(a) DGGE profiles of fecal bacteria in rats from the different groups. Sample numbers above lanes...
<p>The relative quantity of specific groups of bacteria was determined by real-time PCR of 16S rRNA ...
<p>*Results are represented as means±SEM and depict the percent of the respective bacterial group/ge...
<p>A, Shannon’s diversity indices of bacterial populations in Charles River (CR, n = 58) and Harlan ...
HT–high threshold, low-excitable intact rats; LT–low threshold, high-excitable intact rats; n = 18 i...
<p>Bacterial DNA expressed as log genome equivalents/Ml.</p><p>n = number of samples where the bact...
<p>A Distribution of NEC scores in Charles River (solid bars) and Harlan Labs (open bars) rats. B, N...
(A)% of bacteria at genus level in the control and AA groups. Results are presented as the percentag...
a, b, c<p>Mean values within a column with different superscript letters were significantly differen...
<p>CPT-11 injections were carried out on day 1, 2, and 3 of the experiment (see <a href="http://www....
<p>(A) healthy rats, (B) CRC rats. Histogram represents the relative abundance of bacterial phyla in...
HT–high threshold, low-excitable rats; LT–low threshold, high-excitable rats; control–rats without s...
<p>Superscript letters across rows denote significant difference at P<0.05 determined using Mann Whi...
<p>Note:</p>a<p><i>P</i><0.01 compared to group C;</p>b<p><i>P</i><0.01 compared to group H;</p>c<p>...