Add to ORKGNeither the United States Supreme Court nor the Florida Supreme Court has yet ruled whether a defendant\u27s refusal to take the Blood Alcohof Test1 is admissible evidence
It is the purpose of this comment to examine the admissibility and probative value of the tests avai...
NHTSA - Behavioral Safety Researchhttps://doi.org/10.21949/15256112007PDFResearch PaperHedlund, Jame...
Defendant was convicted of statutory rape on the strength of complaining witness\u27 uncorroborated ...
Defendant was convicted of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. This appeal was based on the...
The South Carolina Criminal Justice Academy published Legal Log from 1983-1987 to disseminate inform...
At the instigation of a police officer, a blood sample was taken from defendant Clinton as he lay ho...
Birchfield v. North Dakota involved the ability of legislatures to criminalize a driver’s refusal to...
In June of 1966, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down the decision in the case of Schm...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that an individual charged with driving under the influence ...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that the plain language- of 75 Pa Cons Stat Ann section 3731...
NHTSA - Behavioral Safety Researchhttps://doi.org/10.21949/15256592008PDFResearch PaperBerning, AmyC...
Statutes that criminally penalize suspected drunk drivers who refuse to submit to testing of their b...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that the privilege against self-incrimination grounded in Articl...
This Article explores the state statutes that create a presumption that a person is intoxicated if h...
In Portillo v. United States District Court for the District of Arizona, the Ninth Circuit held that...
It is the purpose of this comment to examine the admissibility and probative value of the tests avai...
NHTSA - Behavioral Safety Researchhttps://doi.org/10.21949/15256112007PDFResearch PaperHedlund, Jame...
Defendant was convicted of statutory rape on the strength of complaining witness\u27 uncorroborated ...
Defendant was convicted of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. This appeal was based on the...
The South Carolina Criminal Justice Academy published Legal Log from 1983-1987 to disseminate inform...
At the instigation of a police officer, a blood sample was taken from defendant Clinton as he lay ho...
Birchfield v. North Dakota involved the ability of legislatures to criminalize a driver’s refusal to...
In June of 1966, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down the decision in the case of Schm...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that an individual charged with driving under the influence ...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that the plain language- of 75 Pa Cons Stat Ann section 3731...
NHTSA - Behavioral Safety Researchhttps://doi.org/10.21949/15256592008PDFResearch PaperBerning, AmyC...
Statutes that criminally penalize suspected drunk drivers who refuse to submit to testing of their b...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that the privilege against self-incrimination grounded in Articl...
This Article explores the state statutes that create a presumption that a person is intoxicated if h...
In Portillo v. United States District Court for the District of Arizona, the Ninth Circuit held that...
It is the purpose of this comment to examine the admissibility and probative value of the tests avai...
NHTSA - Behavioral Safety Researchhttps://doi.org/10.21949/15256112007PDFResearch PaperHedlund, Jame...
Defendant was convicted of statutory rape on the strength of complaining witness\u27 uncorroborated ...