The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that the plain language- of 75 Pa Cons Stat Ann section 3731(a)(4) requires the state to establish the defendant\u27s blood alcohol level at the time of driving. Therefore, when the defendant\u27s blood alcohol level minimally exceeds the statutory limit (0.10%), the time between the defendant\u27s driving and his blood test is substantial, and the state has failed to relate the test results back to the time of driving, the state has not met its burden of proof and the defendant\u27s guilt is left to speculation which is not sufficient for conviction. Commonwealth v Jarman, ___ Pa ___, 601 A2d 1229 (1992)
One among many problems of national moment is the intoxicated motorist. Legislators have long fumble...
Recently, the Supreme Court specifically declined to consider the applicability of Miranda to motor ...
At the instigation of a police officer, a blood sample was taken from defendant Clinton as he lay ho...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that an individual charged with driving under the influence ...
Defendant was tried and convicted of the statutory crime of driving an automobile while under the in...
This Article explores the state statutes that create a presumption that a person is intoxicated if h...
During the past several years in this state it has not been compulsory for persons under arrest to s...
Defendant was convicted of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. This appeal was based on the...
It is the purpose of this comment to examine the admissibility and probative value of the tests avai...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that the driving under the influence violation must be the d...
Birchfield v. North Dakota involved the ability of legislatures to criminalize a driver’s refusal to...
With the constant problem of accidents caused by drinking drivers and the fairly reliable results of...
216935383Final rept.PDFTech ReportVHRC 72-R4Alcohol breath testsAlcohol blood testsBlood alcohol lev...
Few of the government’s investigatory techniques implicate individual privacy concerns more than the...
The State of New York has approved a statute, to go into effect July 1, 1953, which stipulates that ...
One among many problems of national moment is the intoxicated motorist. Legislators have long fumble...
Recently, the Supreme Court specifically declined to consider the applicability of Miranda to motor ...
At the instigation of a police officer, a blood sample was taken from defendant Clinton as he lay ho...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that an individual charged with driving under the influence ...
Defendant was tried and convicted of the statutory crime of driving an automobile while under the in...
This Article explores the state statutes that create a presumption that a person is intoxicated if h...
During the past several years in this state it has not been compulsory for persons under arrest to s...
Defendant was convicted of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. This appeal was based on the...
It is the purpose of this comment to examine the admissibility and probative value of the tests avai...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that the driving under the influence violation must be the d...
Birchfield v. North Dakota involved the ability of legislatures to criminalize a driver’s refusal to...
With the constant problem of accidents caused by drinking drivers and the fairly reliable results of...
216935383Final rept.PDFTech ReportVHRC 72-R4Alcohol breath testsAlcohol blood testsBlood alcohol lev...
Few of the government’s investigatory techniques implicate individual privacy concerns more than the...
The State of New York has approved a statute, to go into effect July 1, 1953, which stipulates that ...
One among many problems of national moment is the intoxicated motorist. Legislators have long fumble...
Recently, the Supreme Court specifically declined to consider the applicability of Miranda to motor ...
At the instigation of a police officer, a blood sample was taken from defendant Clinton as he lay ho...