The State of New York has approved a statute, to go into effect July 1, 1953, which stipulates that any person who operates a motor vehicle or motorcycle in the state shall be deemed to have given his consent to chemical tests of his breath, blood, urine, or saliva for the purpose of determining the alcoholic content of his blood. If such a person refuses to allow the tests, they will not be made, but the commissioner shall revoke his license or permit to drive, including the nonresident operating privilege. This is the first statute of its type and merits attention as a possible solution to the constitutional problems surrounding the extraction of evidence from persons by compulsion, particularly evidence in the form of bodily substances. ...
Statutes that criminally penalize suspected drunk drivers who refuse to submit to testing of their b...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that the privilege against self-incrimination grounded in Articl...
It is the purpose of this comment to examine the admissibility and probative value of the tests avai...
This Article explores the state statutes that create a presumption that a person is intoxicated if h...
With the constant problem of accidents caused by drinking drivers and the fairly reliable results of...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that an individual charged with driving under the influence ...
In June of 1966, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down the decision in the case of Schm...
Constitutional Law-THE DRIVER\u27S RIGHT TO COUNSEL PRIOR TO TAKING A BREATHALYZER TEST-WHAT PROCESS...
Defendant was tried and convicted of the statutory crime of driving an automobile while under the in...
One among many problems of national moment is the intoxicated motorist. Legislators have long fumble...
NHTSA - Behavioral Safety Researchhttps://doi.org/10.21949/15251641983PDFResearch PaperLowery, Forst...
This Note analyzes the constitutional issues raised by section 1192 of New York State\u27s Vehicle a...
This Note assesses how courts have interpreted the text of Schmerber to justify conclusions while de...
Defendant was convicted of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. This appeal was based on the...
Since the landmark decisions of Miranda v. Arizona and Escobedo v. Illinois, state and federal court...
Statutes that criminally penalize suspected drunk drivers who refuse to submit to testing of their b...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that the privilege against self-incrimination grounded in Articl...
It is the purpose of this comment to examine the admissibility and probative value of the tests avai...
This Article explores the state statutes that create a presumption that a person is intoxicated if h...
With the constant problem of accidents caused by drinking drivers and the fairly reliable results of...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that an individual charged with driving under the influence ...
In June of 1966, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down the decision in the case of Schm...
Constitutional Law-THE DRIVER\u27S RIGHT TO COUNSEL PRIOR TO TAKING A BREATHALYZER TEST-WHAT PROCESS...
Defendant was tried and convicted of the statutory crime of driving an automobile while under the in...
One among many problems of national moment is the intoxicated motorist. Legislators have long fumble...
NHTSA - Behavioral Safety Researchhttps://doi.org/10.21949/15251641983PDFResearch PaperLowery, Forst...
This Note analyzes the constitutional issues raised by section 1192 of New York State\u27s Vehicle a...
This Note assesses how courts have interpreted the text of Schmerber to justify conclusions while de...
Defendant was convicted of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. This appeal was based on the...
Since the landmark decisions of Miranda v. Arizona and Escobedo v. Illinois, state and federal court...
Statutes that criminally penalize suspected drunk drivers who refuse to submit to testing of their b...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that the privilege against self-incrimination grounded in Articl...
It is the purpose of this comment to examine the admissibility and probative value of the tests avai...