Add to ORKGDefendant was convicted of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. This appeal was based on the contention that the testimony by a deputy sheriff of defendant\u27s refusal to submit to a blood test to determine whether or not he was intoxicated violated his privilege against self-incrimination and was inadmissible. Held, the evidence was properly admitted. State v. Benson, (Iowa, 1941) 300 N. W. 275
The State of New York has approved a statute, to go into effect July 1, 1953, which stipulates that ...
This Note assesses how courts have interpreted the text of Schmerber to justify conclusions while de...
Birchfield v. North Dakota involved the ability of legislatures to criminalize a driver’s refusal to...
Defendant was convicted of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. This appeal was based on the...
Defendant was tried and convicted of the statutory crime of driving an automobile while under the in...
At the instigation of a police officer, a blood sample was taken from defendant Clinton as he lay ho...
In June of 1966, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down the decision in the case of Schm...
Neither the United States Supreme Court nor the Florida Supreme Court has yet ruled whether a defend...
At trial on charges of manslaughter and driving a vehicle under the influence of intoxicating liquor...
This Article explores the state statutes that create a presumption that a person is intoxicated if h...
Defendant was injured in an automobile accident and while unconscious a blood sample was taken by a ...
It is the purpose of this comment to examine the admissibility and probative value of the tests avai...
Defendant was convicted of statutory rape on the strength of complaining witness\u27 uncorroborated ...
The South Carolina Criminal Justice Academy published Legal Log from 1983-1987 to disseminate inform...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that the plain language- of 75 Pa Cons Stat Ann section 3731...
The State of New York has approved a statute, to go into effect July 1, 1953, which stipulates that ...
This Note assesses how courts have interpreted the text of Schmerber to justify conclusions while de...
Birchfield v. North Dakota involved the ability of legislatures to criminalize a driver’s refusal to...
Defendant was convicted of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. This appeal was based on the...
Defendant was tried and convicted of the statutory crime of driving an automobile while under the in...
At the instigation of a police officer, a blood sample was taken from defendant Clinton as he lay ho...
In June of 1966, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down the decision in the case of Schm...
Neither the United States Supreme Court nor the Florida Supreme Court has yet ruled whether a defend...
At trial on charges of manslaughter and driving a vehicle under the influence of intoxicating liquor...
This Article explores the state statutes that create a presumption that a person is intoxicated if h...
Defendant was injured in an automobile accident and while unconscious a blood sample was taken by a ...
It is the purpose of this comment to examine the admissibility and probative value of the tests avai...
Defendant was convicted of statutory rape on the strength of complaining witness\u27 uncorroborated ...
The South Carolina Criminal Justice Academy published Legal Log from 1983-1987 to disseminate inform...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that the plain language- of 75 Pa Cons Stat Ann section 3731...
The State of New York has approved a statute, to go into effect July 1, 1953, which stipulates that ...
This Note assesses how courts have interpreted the text of Schmerber to justify conclusions while de...
Birchfield v. North Dakota involved the ability of legislatures to criminalize a driver’s refusal to...