Add to ORKGRecently, the Supreme Court specifically declined to consider the applicability of Miranda to motor vehicle cases in general. The various state courts are now being called upon to decide the extent of its application and, in particular, whether the Miranda mandate controls in misdemeanor proceedings. This article examines the present status of Miranda in relation to drinking driver traffic offenses as interpreted by the various courts, and the necessity of extending the rule to these offenses
The South Carolina Criminal Justice Academy published Legal Log from 1983-1987 to disseminate inform...
Statutes that criminally penalize suspected drunk drivers who refuse to submit to testing of their b...
This Article explores the state statutes that create a presumption that a person is intoxicated if h...
Recently, the Supreme Court specifically declined to consider the applicability of Miranda to motor ...
With the constant problem of accidents caused by drinking drivers and the fairly reliable results of...
This comment will examine decisions addressing the constitutionality of roadblock stops. First, it w...
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.For the past several years the problem of drunk...
This examination into the various aspects of defending an intoxicated driver is by no means complete...
This article discusses the issue that federal Courts of Appeals have grappled with: whether an inves...
Since the landmark decisions of Miranda v. Arizona and Escobedo v. Illinois, state and federal court...
After the Georgia Supreme Court’s rulings in Olevik v. State and Elliott v. State, Georgia’s DUI Imp...
In response to strong public pressure, Ohio has adopted a stringent D WI law which increased penalti...
In State v. Bragg, Tammy Bragg was convicted of a Class D crime for operating under the influence (O...
In Miranda v. Arizona, the United States Supreme Court set forth a series of specific guidelines to ...
Birchfield v. North Dakota involved the ability of legislatures to criminalize a driver’s refusal to...
The South Carolina Criminal Justice Academy published Legal Log from 1983-1987 to disseminate inform...
Statutes that criminally penalize suspected drunk drivers who refuse to submit to testing of their b...
This Article explores the state statutes that create a presumption that a person is intoxicated if h...
Recently, the Supreme Court specifically declined to consider the applicability of Miranda to motor ...
With the constant problem of accidents caused by drinking drivers and the fairly reliable results of...
This comment will examine decisions addressing the constitutionality of roadblock stops. First, it w...
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.For the past several years the problem of drunk...
This examination into the various aspects of defending an intoxicated driver is by no means complete...
This article discusses the issue that federal Courts of Appeals have grappled with: whether an inves...
Since the landmark decisions of Miranda v. Arizona and Escobedo v. Illinois, state and federal court...
After the Georgia Supreme Court’s rulings in Olevik v. State and Elliott v. State, Georgia’s DUI Imp...
In response to strong public pressure, Ohio has adopted a stringent D WI law which increased penalti...
In State v. Bragg, Tammy Bragg was convicted of a Class D crime for operating under the influence (O...
In Miranda v. Arizona, the United States Supreme Court set forth a series of specific guidelines to ...
Birchfield v. North Dakota involved the ability of legislatures to criminalize a driver’s refusal to...
The South Carolina Criminal Justice Academy published Legal Log from 1983-1987 to disseminate inform...
Statutes that criminally penalize suspected drunk drivers who refuse to submit to testing of their b...
This Article explores the state statutes that create a presumption that a person is intoxicated if h...