Add to ORKGIn Portillo v. United States District Court for the District of Arizona, the Ninth Circuit held that mandatory presentence urine testing of a convicted defendant violates the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The court concluded that, because the particular facts of the case and the lack of information about the defendant\u27s past drug usage did not support the district court\u27s order, urine testing was constitutionally impermissible
In United States v. Ruiz-Gaxiola, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that...
In Arizona v. Evans, the United States Supreme Court considered whether the exclusionary rule requir...
Gregory Frank Allen Sample (“Sample”) was arrested for driving under the influence. He had failed a ...
In Portillo v. United States District Court for the District of Arizona, the Ninth Circuit held that...
The United States Supreme Court held that drug urinalysis conducted on student athletes is constitut...
In Vernonia School District 47J v. Acton, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Fourth Amendment to t...
During the last decade, the United States Supreme Court has rendered four major decisions regarding ...
In June of 1966, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down the decision in the case of Schm...
The New York Court of Appeals held that mandatory urinalysis examination of public school teachers v...
I. Introduction to Warrantless Urine Testing II. Development of the Law As It Applies to Chemical Te...
The United States Supreme Court held that the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule applies ...
The United States Supreme Court held that evidence tending to show different treatment of similarly ...
In Birchfield v. North Dakota, the Supreme Court explored warrantless breath tests during DUI stops ...
Modern courts frequently allow the use of blood grouping tests in paternity cases. There is now . ....
138 On the Constitutionality of Mandatory Pretrial DNA Tests on Those Arrested or Indicted for a Fel...
In United States v. Ruiz-Gaxiola, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that...
In Arizona v. Evans, the United States Supreme Court considered whether the exclusionary rule requir...
Gregory Frank Allen Sample (“Sample”) was arrested for driving under the influence. He had failed a ...
In Portillo v. United States District Court for the District of Arizona, the Ninth Circuit held that...
The United States Supreme Court held that drug urinalysis conducted on student athletes is constitut...
In Vernonia School District 47J v. Acton, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Fourth Amendment to t...
During the last decade, the United States Supreme Court has rendered four major decisions regarding ...
In June of 1966, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down the decision in the case of Schm...
The New York Court of Appeals held that mandatory urinalysis examination of public school teachers v...
I. Introduction to Warrantless Urine Testing II. Development of the Law As It Applies to Chemical Te...
The United States Supreme Court held that the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule applies ...
The United States Supreme Court held that evidence tending to show different treatment of similarly ...
In Birchfield v. North Dakota, the Supreme Court explored warrantless breath tests during DUI stops ...
Modern courts frequently allow the use of blood grouping tests in paternity cases. There is now . ....
138 On the Constitutionality of Mandatory Pretrial DNA Tests on Those Arrested or Indicted for a Fel...
In United States v. Ruiz-Gaxiola, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that...
In Arizona v. Evans, the United States Supreme Court considered whether the exclusionary rule requir...
Gregory Frank Allen Sample (“Sample”) was arrested for driving under the influence. He had failed a ...