In 1987, the United States Sentencing Commission took what was supposed to be the first step in an evolutionary process whose ultimate goal was to establish rational policies and guidelines for criminal sentencing. The Sentencing Commission began its work by establishing guidelines and policies for sentencing natural persons. It now has proceeded to consider sentencing guidelines for corporations. The consideration of penalties for corporations began with a discussion draft containing a proposal for sentencing guidelines for corporations, and proceeded to public hearings on the topic in October and November of 1988. A year later, in November, 1989, events took a different turn as the Sentencing Commission itself published its own Preli...
This article compares the criminal punishment of corporations in the twenty-first century with two a...
A tendency towards more bureaucracy is notable in various public and private American institutions i...
This Article examines innovative corporate sentences beyond fines. It emphasizes types of corporate ...
In 1987, the United States Sentencing Commission took what was supposed to be the first step in an ...
The first Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Organizational Defendants ( Guidelines ) became effecti...
This Article traces the Sentencing Commission\u27s path in completing that task32 and considers what...
Part I of this Article provides a brief overview of the Guidelines and discusses how they define and...
In this article, Professor O\u27Sullivan, who served as the reporter for the U.S. Sentencing Commiss...
This paper examines the 1991 federal sentencing guidelines with respect to organizations. These guid...
Essentially, what is wrong with the Guidelines is that they are rules without -without rationality,...
The common theme in the Articles by Barry Baysinger and Jonathan Macey is that standard economic the...
Established principles governing corporate criminal liability apply indiscriminately to all corporat...
The new Draft Guidelines for Organizational Defendants released by the U.S. Sentencing Commission ...
Sentencing commissions, administrative agencies charged to develop and promulgate standards for sent...
In an effort to stimulate discussion on the policy choices that Congress should have (but has not) m...
This article compares the criminal punishment of corporations in the twenty-first century with two a...
A tendency towards more bureaucracy is notable in various public and private American institutions i...
This Article examines innovative corporate sentences beyond fines. It emphasizes types of corporate ...
In 1987, the United States Sentencing Commission took what was supposed to be the first step in an ...
The first Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Organizational Defendants ( Guidelines ) became effecti...
This Article traces the Sentencing Commission\u27s path in completing that task32 and considers what...
Part I of this Article provides a brief overview of the Guidelines and discusses how they define and...
In this article, Professor O\u27Sullivan, who served as the reporter for the U.S. Sentencing Commiss...
This paper examines the 1991 federal sentencing guidelines with respect to organizations. These guid...
Essentially, what is wrong with the Guidelines is that they are rules without -without rationality,...
The common theme in the Articles by Barry Baysinger and Jonathan Macey is that standard economic the...
Established principles governing corporate criminal liability apply indiscriminately to all corporat...
The new Draft Guidelines for Organizational Defendants released by the U.S. Sentencing Commission ...
Sentencing commissions, administrative agencies charged to develop and promulgate standards for sent...
In an effort to stimulate discussion on the policy choices that Congress should have (but has not) m...
This article compares the criminal punishment of corporations in the twenty-first century with two a...
A tendency towards more bureaucracy is notable in various public and private American institutions i...
This Article examines innovative corporate sentences beyond fines. It emphasizes types of corporate ...