In an effort to stimulate discussion on the policy choices that Congress should have (but has not) made concerning corporate crime, and in an effort to underscore how deeply the Guidelines arrogate to the Commission basic policy matters that are more properly within the business of Congress, I propose a Model Federal Corporate Criminal Code. This Code is designed to function either independently of, or in conjunction with, a sentencing commission and is based on a number of explicit policy preferences
[Excerpt] “Until the passage of the U.S. Federal Sentencing Guidelines in 1984, federal judges had r...
The Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 sought to bring consistency, coherence, and accountability to a fe...
In 1987, the Nation’s first attempt to standardize federal sentencing came in the form of the United...
Essentially, what is wrong with the Guidelines is that they are rules without -without rationality,...
This Article traces the Sentencing Commission\u27s path in completing that task32 and considers what...
Part I of this Article provides a brief overview of the Guidelines and discusses how they define and...
We are accustomed to thinking about the criminal law, and the procedures for enforcing it, as divide...
The first Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Organizational Defendants ( Guidelines ) became effecti...
This Article examines innovative corporate sentences beyond fines. It emphasizes types of corporate ...
In 1987, the United States Sentencing Commission took what was supposed to be the first step in an ...
Established principles governing corporate criminal liability apply indiscriminately to all corporat...
Includes Appendix: Executive Summary of the Report of the Ad Hoc Advisory Group on the Organizationa...
Any discussion of federal penal law must begin with an important caveat: There actually is no federa...
This paper examines the 1991 federal sentencing guidelines with respect to organizations. These guid...
The four chief factors influencing the quality of American justice were identified by Dean Roscoe Po...
[Excerpt] “Until the passage of the U.S. Federal Sentencing Guidelines in 1984, federal judges had r...
The Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 sought to bring consistency, coherence, and accountability to a fe...
In 1987, the Nation’s first attempt to standardize federal sentencing came in the form of the United...
Essentially, what is wrong with the Guidelines is that they are rules without -without rationality,...
This Article traces the Sentencing Commission\u27s path in completing that task32 and considers what...
Part I of this Article provides a brief overview of the Guidelines and discusses how they define and...
We are accustomed to thinking about the criminal law, and the procedures for enforcing it, as divide...
The first Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Organizational Defendants ( Guidelines ) became effecti...
This Article examines innovative corporate sentences beyond fines. It emphasizes types of corporate ...
In 1987, the United States Sentencing Commission took what was supposed to be the first step in an ...
Established principles governing corporate criminal liability apply indiscriminately to all corporat...
Includes Appendix: Executive Summary of the Report of the Ad Hoc Advisory Group on the Organizationa...
Any discussion of federal penal law must begin with an important caveat: There actually is no federa...
This paper examines the 1991 federal sentencing guidelines with respect to organizations. These guid...
The four chief factors influencing the quality of American justice were identified by Dean Roscoe Po...
[Excerpt] “Until the passage of the U.S. Federal Sentencing Guidelines in 1984, federal judges had r...
The Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 sought to bring consistency, coherence, and accountability to a fe...
In 1987, the Nation’s first attempt to standardize federal sentencing came in the form of the United...