This paper examines the 1991 federal sentencing guidelines with respect to organizations. These guidelines, only recently being applied in U.S. courts, require minimum fines and imprisonment terms for criminal acts by culpable executives and their organizations. The paper will examine the history of the federal sentencing guidelines for organizations (FSGOs), a synopsis of their workings, the strategic response of U.S. companies to the FSGOs, and the case for and against these guidelines. Finally, this paper will examine the managerial implications of the FSGOs with special attention provided to the ethical issues raised by the guidelines
Established principles governing corporate criminal liability apply indiscriminately to all corporat...
In this article, Professor O\u27Sullivan, who served as the reporter for the U.S. Sentencing Commiss...
This article compares the criminal punishment of corporations in the twenty-first century with two a...
This paper examines the 1991 federal sentencing guidelines with respect to organizations. These guid...
We combine prior research on ethical decisionmaking in organizations with a rational choice theory o...
The first Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Organizational Defendants ( Guidelines ) became effecti...
Part I of this Article provides a brief overview of the Guidelines and discusses how they define and...
Corporate criminal liability puts a serious challenge to the economictheory of enforcement. Are corp...
In 1987, the United States Sentencing Commission took what was supposed to be the first step in an ...
The quintessential principal of corporate governance is that the corporation\u27s business should be...
This Article traces the Sentencing Commission\u27s path in completing that task32 and considers what...
Organizations that have benefitted from the commission of federal crimes committed by their employee...
The U.S. Sentencing Commission\u27s Organizational Guidelines for over twenty years have offered fir...
The EU is undeniably strengthening its grip on national criminal law in its fight against corporate ...
This Article examines innovative corporate sentences beyond fines. It emphasizes types of corporate ...
Established principles governing corporate criminal liability apply indiscriminately to all corporat...
In this article, Professor O\u27Sullivan, who served as the reporter for the U.S. Sentencing Commiss...
This article compares the criminal punishment of corporations in the twenty-first century with two a...
This paper examines the 1991 federal sentencing guidelines with respect to organizations. These guid...
We combine prior research on ethical decisionmaking in organizations with a rational choice theory o...
The first Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Organizational Defendants ( Guidelines ) became effecti...
Part I of this Article provides a brief overview of the Guidelines and discusses how they define and...
Corporate criminal liability puts a serious challenge to the economictheory of enforcement. Are corp...
In 1987, the United States Sentencing Commission took what was supposed to be the first step in an ...
The quintessential principal of corporate governance is that the corporation\u27s business should be...
This Article traces the Sentencing Commission\u27s path in completing that task32 and considers what...
Organizations that have benefitted from the commission of federal crimes committed by their employee...
The U.S. Sentencing Commission\u27s Organizational Guidelines for over twenty years have offered fir...
The EU is undeniably strengthening its grip on national criminal law in its fight against corporate ...
This Article examines innovative corporate sentences beyond fines. It emphasizes types of corporate ...
Established principles governing corporate criminal liability apply indiscriminately to all corporat...
In this article, Professor O\u27Sullivan, who served as the reporter for the U.S. Sentencing Commiss...
This article compares the criminal punishment of corporations in the twenty-first century with two a...