This Article traces the Sentencing Commission\u27s path in completing that task32 and considers what work lies ahead. The Article addresses four specific questions: (1) Given that the Commission\u27s primary mandate is to facilitate greater certainty, uniformity, effectiveness and rationality in the sentencing of individuals, why did the Commission tackle the area of corporate sentencing at all? (2) How did the Commission arrive at the philosophical bases that underlie the fine provisions of the corporate sentencing guidelines? (3) How did the principles of deterrence and just punishment for the offense shape the Commission\u27s decisionmaking with respect to the key structural issues involved in creating the corporate fine guidelines, and ...
This is the third in a series of articles analyzing the current turmoil in federal criminal sentenci...
The Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 sought to bring consistency, coherence, and accountability to a fe...
In the two years since the landmark Booker decision, federal sentencing policy has been in a state o...
In this article, Professor O\u27Sullivan, who served as the reporter for the U.S. Sentencing Commiss...
Essentially, what is wrong with the Guidelines is that they are rules without -without rationality,...
This Article examines innovative corporate sentences beyond fines. It emphasizes types of corporate ...
Part I of this Article provides a brief overview of the Guidelines and discusses how they define and...
In 1987, the United States Sentencing Commission took what was supposed to be the first step in an ...
Established principles governing corporate criminal liability apply indiscriminately to all corporat...
This Article is the third of twelve parts of a set of Model Federal Sentencing Guidelines designed t...
In an effort to stimulate discussion on the policy choices that Congress should have (but has not) m...
The first Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Organizational Defendants ( Guidelines ) became effecti...
This Article explains how the federal organizational sentencing guidelines work and how they have cr...
In 1987, the Nation’s first attempt to standardize federal sentencing came in the form of the United...
This article outlines the evolution of sentencing standards over the years. It identifies several ke...
This is the third in a series of articles analyzing the current turmoil in federal criminal sentenci...
The Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 sought to bring consistency, coherence, and accountability to a fe...
In the two years since the landmark Booker decision, federal sentencing policy has been in a state o...
In this article, Professor O\u27Sullivan, who served as the reporter for the U.S. Sentencing Commiss...
Essentially, what is wrong with the Guidelines is that they are rules without -without rationality,...
This Article examines innovative corporate sentences beyond fines. It emphasizes types of corporate ...
Part I of this Article provides a brief overview of the Guidelines and discusses how they define and...
In 1987, the United States Sentencing Commission took what was supposed to be the first step in an ...
Established principles governing corporate criminal liability apply indiscriminately to all corporat...
This Article is the third of twelve parts of a set of Model Federal Sentencing Guidelines designed t...
In an effort to stimulate discussion on the policy choices that Congress should have (but has not) m...
The first Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Organizational Defendants ( Guidelines ) became effecti...
This Article explains how the federal organizational sentencing guidelines work and how they have cr...
In 1987, the Nation’s first attempt to standardize federal sentencing came in the form of the United...
This article outlines the evolution of sentencing standards over the years. It identifies several ke...
This is the third in a series of articles analyzing the current turmoil in federal criminal sentenci...
The Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 sought to bring consistency, coherence, and accountability to a fe...
In the two years since the landmark Booker decision, federal sentencing policy has been in a state o...