Add to ORKGDefendant, a theatre owner, in March, 1939, entered into a collective bargaining contract with a local union by the terms of which he agreed to hire only union operators, to pay them a specified wage, and to give them two weeks\u27 notice of their discharge, or two weeks\u27 salary in lieu thereof, should he decide to go out of business. Plaintiff, a union member, was employed by the defendant from March, 1939, until he was discharged in December, 1939. It appeared that this discharge was occasioned by defendant\u27s sale of his theatre and retirement from the business. Plaintiff sued for breach of the contract between defendant and the union, and claimed as damages his wages from December, 1939, until the commencement of this suit. Held, r...
A condition of the closed-shop agreement between defendant labor union and a manufacturing concern r...
An employee tendered dues and initiation fee to the union which had a union shop contract with her e...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that a union may be liable to a discharged employee ...
Defendant, a theatre owner, in March, 1939, entered into a collective bargaining contract with a loc...
Plaintiff, an unincorporated labor organization, filed suit in federal district court to enforce a c...
Defendant agreed with an employees\u27 union that its employees would not be discharged without caus...
The employer entered into a collective bargaining agreement with the employees as represented by Uni...
Plaintiff was an employee of defendant corporation, and an officer of the union accredited as bargai...
Plaintiff-employee was informed by the defendant, his employer, that his employment would be termina...
Plaintiff corporation and defendant union entered into a collective bargaining agreement which provi...
Plaintiff, a Wisconsin labor union, was granted a temporary injunction restraining defendant shoe co...
Employer and union had an existing collective agreement which provided detailed procedures for adjus...
Following a strike at respondent corporation which had started prior to the effective date of the Na...
A one-day sit-down strike occurred in the employer\u27s plant on March 16, 1937. A general strike wa...
Prior to the passage of the Wagner Act, respondent\u27s employees went on strike when the respondent...
A condition of the closed-shop agreement between defendant labor union and a manufacturing concern r...
An employee tendered dues and initiation fee to the union which had a union shop contract with her e...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that a union may be liable to a discharged employee ...
Defendant, a theatre owner, in March, 1939, entered into a collective bargaining contract with a loc...
Plaintiff, an unincorporated labor organization, filed suit in federal district court to enforce a c...
Defendant agreed with an employees\u27 union that its employees would not be discharged without caus...
The employer entered into a collective bargaining agreement with the employees as represented by Uni...
Plaintiff was an employee of defendant corporation, and an officer of the union accredited as bargai...
Plaintiff-employee was informed by the defendant, his employer, that his employment would be termina...
Plaintiff corporation and defendant union entered into a collective bargaining agreement which provi...
Plaintiff, a Wisconsin labor union, was granted a temporary injunction restraining defendant shoe co...
Employer and union had an existing collective agreement which provided detailed procedures for adjus...
Following a strike at respondent corporation which had started prior to the effective date of the Na...
A one-day sit-down strike occurred in the employer\u27s plant on March 16, 1937. A general strike wa...
Prior to the passage of the Wagner Act, respondent\u27s employees went on strike when the respondent...
A condition of the closed-shop agreement between defendant labor union and a manufacturing concern r...
An employee tendered dues and initiation fee to the union which had a union shop contract with her e...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that a union may be liable to a discharged employee ...