An employee tendered dues and initiation fee to the union which had a union shop contract with her employer. The union then wrote her a letter welcoming her into membership. She replied that although she had tendered dues and initiation fee she was not joining the union. The union thereupon requested her employer to discharge her pursuant to the provisions of their union shop agreement signed under the 1951 amendment to the Railway Labor Act. After going through the regular grievance procedure the matter came before the arbitrator for .final settlement. Held, the union was entitled to demand the employee\u27s discharge. The proviso to section two, eleventh of the Railway Labor Act as amended in 1951 [which was intended to be similar to prov...
An interstate trucking concern with depots in numerous cities, was approached by a union seeking rec...
Defendant, a theatre owner, in March, 1939, entered into a collective bargaining contract with a loc...
In negotiations arising out of a major dispute under the Railway Labor Act, defendant\u27s union r...
An employee tendered dues and initiation fee to the union which had a union shop contract with her e...
A condition of the closed-shop agreement between defendant labor union and a manufacturing concern r...
Under section 8(a)(3) of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), a majority union and an employer a...
ln the first of three cases involving employer encouragement of union membership the National Labor ...
Prior to the passage of the Wagner Act, respondent\u27s employees went on strike when the respondent...
A member of the United Electrical Workers Union was discharged from the J. H. Day Company because of...
Following a strike at respondent corporation which had started prior to the effective date of the Na...
While bargaining for a new contract, the union announced that it would engage in a work-without-con...
The National Labor Relations Board has held that any union restriction on a member\u27s right to res...
The National Labor Relations Board found on complaint of a rival union that Bowman Transportation, I...
The National Labor Relations Board found that the employer (respondent) had been guilty of unfair la...
Employer and union had an existing collective agreement which provided detailed procedures for adjus...
An interstate trucking concern with depots in numerous cities, was approached by a union seeking rec...
Defendant, a theatre owner, in March, 1939, entered into a collective bargaining contract with a loc...
In negotiations arising out of a major dispute under the Railway Labor Act, defendant\u27s union r...
An employee tendered dues and initiation fee to the union which had a union shop contract with her e...
A condition of the closed-shop agreement between defendant labor union and a manufacturing concern r...
Under section 8(a)(3) of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), a majority union and an employer a...
ln the first of three cases involving employer encouragement of union membership the National Labor ...
Prior to the passage of the Wagner Act, respondent\u27s employees went on strike when the respondent...
A member of the United Electrical Workers Union was discharged from the J. H. Day Company because of...
Following a strike at respondent corporation which had started prior to the effective date of the Na...
While bargaining for a new contract, the union announced that it would engage in a work-without-con...
The National Labor Relations Board has held that any union restriction on a member\u27s right to res...
The National Labor Relations Board found on complaint of a rival union that Bowman Transportation, I...
The National Labor Relations Board found that the employer (respondent) had been guilty of unfair la...
Employer and union had an existing collective agreement which provided detailed procedures for adjus...
An interstate trucking concern with depots in numerous cities, was approached by a union seeking rec...
Defendant, a theatre owner, in March, 1939, entered into a collective bargaining contract with a loc...
In negotiations arising out of a major dispute under the Railway Labor Act, defendant\u27s union r...