Add to ORKGA one-day sit-down strike occurred in the employer\u27s plant on March 16, 1937. A general strike was called on the following day and lasted until June 24, 1937. On March 25, 1937, the employer sent a notice to all employees including the sit-downers urging them to return to work. The National Labor Relations Board found the company guilty of various unfair labor practices, all of which occurred during the general strike, and ordered a reinstatement of all employees who were on strike March 23, 1937, with back pay and full seniority rights. Petitioner asserted that the men who engaged in the sit-down strike were no longer employees entitled to the protection of the act and challenged the order in so far as it reinstated them. Held, that...
The National Labor Relations Board found that the employer (respondent) had been guilty of unfair la...
The grievor, who had been employed as a press operated for four years, broke one forming die on each...
Having found that the petitioner, by discharging employees for union activities, had engaged in an u...
A one-day sit-down strike occurred in the employer\u27s plant on March 16, 1937. A general strike wa...
Prior to the passage of the Wagner Act, respondent\u27s employees went on strike when the respondent...
One hundred and seventy employees of the respondent, predominantly union members, engaged in an eco...
Following a strike at respondent corporation which had started prior to the effective date of the Na...
Petitioner clearly committed unfair labor practices and a strike in protest resulted. Thirty-one day...
A union gave notice of its desire to modify the existing collective bargaining agreement sixty days ...
The defendant company, operating a produce plant, was found guilty by the National Labor Relations B...
The collective bargaining agreement between the Laidlaw Corporation and Local 681 of the Internation...
After several months of unsuccessful negotiations on a new contract, a local union of truck drivers,...
In July, 1940, the Wage-Hour Administrator obtained a consent decree restraining defendant from viol...
Employer and union had an existing collective agreement which provided detailed procedures for adjus...
The Norris-LaGuardia Act was enacted in 1932 to curb the unbridled use of the federal injunction as ...
The National Labor Relations Board found that the employer (respondent) had been guilty of unfair la...
The grievor, who had been employed as a press operated for four years, broke one forming die on each...
Having found that the petitioner, by discharging employees for union activities, had engaged in an u...
A one-day sit-down strike occurred in the employer\u27s plant on March 16, 1937. A general strike wa...
Prior to the passage of the Wagner Act, respondent\u27s employees went on strike when the respondent...
One hundred and seventy employees of the respondent, predominantly union members, engaged in an eco...
Following a strike at respondent corporation which had started prior to the effective date of the Na...
Petitioner clearly committed unfair labor practices and a strike in protest resulted. Thirty-one day...
A union gave notice of its desire to modify the existing collective bargaining agreement sixty days ...
The defendant company, operating a produce plant, was found guilty by the National Labor Relations B...
The collective bargaining agreement between the Laidlaw Corporation and Local 681 of the Internation...
After several months of unsuccessful negotiations on a new contract, a local union of truck drivers,...
In July, 1940, the Wage-Hour Administrator obtained a consent decree restraining defendant from viol...
Employer and union had an existing collective agreement which provided detailed procedures for adjus...
The Norris-LaGuardia Act was enacted in 1932 to curb the unbridled use of the federal injunction as ...
The National Labor Relations Board found that the employer (respondent) had been guilty of unfair la...
The grievor, who had been employed as a press operated for four years, broke one forming die on each...
Having found that the petitioner, by discharging employees for union activities, had engaged in an u...