Add to ORKGHundreds of thousands of unpublished opinions are now available on electronic databases. Although these opinions have not been designated as officially published precedent, they still may have a significant impact on the outcome of your client\u27s case. The dilemma is whether you can or should cite these unpublished cases in your brief
Mr. Gerken provides readers with an overview of the rules and practice related to the nonpublication...
Debate over unpublished judicial opinions and no-citation rules frequently proceeds without full and...
An unfair system has evolved over the past fifteen years in the federal courts. The federal courts c...
Hundreds of thousands of unpublished opinions are now available on electronic databases. Although ...
The practice of unpublished decisions and their precedential value causes much controversy. The prac...
The federal courts of appeals have used unpublished opinions for thirty years as one method of cop...
The rise of cases brought before federal appellate courts has caused most opinions to be designated ...
Imagine that you are an attorney, litigating an appellate case with an atypical fact pattern. You ar...
Professor Dragich examines the no-citation rules of the federal courts of appeals in light of the pu...
This Comment is divided into seven parts. Part I provides an overview of the current practice concer...
On December 1, 2006, Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.1 will take effect, allowing citation to...
Some states still restrict the citation of unpublished opinions, and the rules among the federal cir...
This article discusses the courts\u27 adoption of the limited publication plans and analyzes the met...
Some legal researchers may assume that all cases decided by federal courts are published. However, m...
Many appellate court opinions are unpublished and have no precedential value. Publication standards ...
Mr. Gerken provides readers with an overview of the rules and practice related to the nonpublication...
Debate over unpublished judicial opinions and no-citation rules frequently proceeds without full and...
An unfair system has evolved over the past fifteen years in the federal courts. The federal courts c...
Hundreds of thousands of unpublished opinions are now available on electronic databases. Although ...
The practice of unpublished decisions and their precedential value causes much controversy. The prac...
The federal courts of appeals have used unpublished opinions for thirty years as one method of cop...
The rise of cases brought before federal appellate courts has caused most opinions to be designated ...
Imagine that you are an attorney, litigating an appellate case with an atypical fact pattern. You ar...
Professor Dragich examines the no-citation rules of the federal courts of appeals in light of the pu...
This Comment is divided into seven parts. Part I provides an overview of the current practice concer...
On December 1, 2006, Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.1 will take effect, allowing citation to...
Some states still restrict the citation of unpublished opinions, and the rules among the federal cir...
This article discusses the courts\u27 adoption of the limited publication plans and analyzes the met...
Some legal researchers may assume that all cases decided by federal courts are published. However, m...
Many appellate court opinions are unpublished and have no precedential value. Publication standards ...
Mr. Gerken provides readers with an overview of the rules and practice related to the nonpublication...
Debate over unpublished judicial opinions and no-citation rules frequently proceeds without full and...
An unfair system has evolved over the past fifteen years in the federal courts. The federal courts c...