Add to ORKGMany appellate court opinions are unpublished and have no precedential value. Publication standards vary for each jurisdiction. The different standards are presented in table form
For more than a quarter century, the United States Courts of Appeals have maintained two bodies of l...
Hundreds of thousands of unpublished opinions are now available on electronic databases. Although ...
An unfair system has evolved over the past fifteen years in the federal courts. The federal courts c...
Many appellate court opinions are unpublished and have no precedential value. Publication standards ...
The rise of cases brought before federal appellate courts has caused most opinions to be designated ...
The federal courts of appeals have used unpublished opinions for thirty years as one method of cop...
This Comment is divided into seven parts. Part I provides an overview of the current practice concer...
Professor Dragich examines the no-citation rules of the federal courts of appeals in light of the pu...
Imagine that you are an attorney, litigating an appellate case with an atypical fact pattern. You ar...
On December 1, 2006, Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.1 will take effect, allowing citation to...
Debate over unpublished judicial opinions and no-citation rules frequently proceeds without full and...
In the wake of the publication of Anastasoff v. United States a new round of debate has begun over t...
The practice of unpublished decisions and their precedential value causes much controversy. The prac...
Some legal researchers may assume that all cases decided by federal courts are published. However, m...
In response to the crisis of volume, state and federal appellate courts have been restricting the ...
For more than a quarter century, the United States Courts of Appeals have maintained two bodies of l...
Hundreds of thousands of unpublished opinions are now available on electronic databases. Although ...
An unfair system has evolved over the past fifteen years in the federal courts. The federal courts c...
Many appellate court opinions are unpublished and have no precedential value. Publication standards ...
The rise of cases brought before federal appellate courts has caused most opinions to be designated ...
The federal courts of appeals have used unpublished opinions for thirty years as one method of cop...
This Comment is divided into seven parts. Part I provides an overview of the current practice concer...
Professor Dragich examines the no-citation rules of the federal courts of appeals in light of the pu...
Imagine that you are an attorney, litigating an appellate case with an atypical fact pattern. You ar...
On December 1, 2006, Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.1 will take effect, allowing citation to...
Debate over unpublished judicial opinions and no-citation rules frequently proceeds without full and...
In the wake of the publication of Anastasoff v. United States a new round of debate has begun over t...
The practice of unpublished decisions and their precedential value causes much controversy. The prac...
Some legal researchers may assume that all cases decided by federal courts are published. However, m...
In response to the crisis of volume, state and federal appellate courts have been restricting the ...
For more than a quarter century, the United States Courts of Appeals have maintained two bodies of l...
Hundreds of thousands of unpublished opinions are now available on electronic databases. Although ...
An unfair system has evolved over the past fifteen years in the federal courts. The federal courts c...