Add to ORKGMr. Gerken provides readers with an overview of the rules and practice related to the nonpublication of judicial decisions. Using a question-and-answer format, he offers a convenient reference source for librarians to consult when responding to patron inquiries about unpublished opinions. A selective annotated bibliography of articles on the subject is included
Professor Dragich examines the no-citation rules of the federal courts of appeals in light of the pu...
An unfair system has evolved over the past fifteen years in the federal courts. The federal courts c...
Debate over unpublished judicial opinions and no-citation rules frequently proceeds without full and...
Mr. Gerken provides readers with an overview of the rules and practice related to the nonpublication...
The practice of unpublished decisions and their precedential value causes much controversy. The prac...
Hundreds of thousands of unpublished opinions are now available on electronic databases. Although ...
Some legal researchers may assume that all cases decided by federal courts are published. However, m...
Unpublished appellate judicial opinions present formidable challenges for modern legal researchers, ...
The federal courts of appeals have used unpublished opinions for thirty years as one method of cop...
Imagine that you are an attorney, litigating an appellate case with an atypical fact pattern. You ar...
The rise of cases brought before federal appellate courts has caused most opinions to be designated ...
This article discusses the courts\u27 adoption of the limited publication plans and analyzes the met...
On December 1, 2006, Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.1 will take effect, allowing citation to...
This Comment is divided into seven parts. Part I provides an overview of the current practice concer...
A Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure that took effect at the end of 2006 overturned past policies i...
Professor Dragich examines the no-citation rules of the federal courts of appeals in light of the pu...
An unfair system has evolved over the past fifteen years in the federal courts. The federal courts c...
Debate over unpublished judicial opinions and no-citation rules frequently proceeds without full and...
Mr. Gerken provides readers with an overview of the rules and practice related to the nonpublication...
The practice of unpublished decisions and their precedential value causes much controversy. The prac...
Hundreds of thousands of unpublished opinions are now available on electronic databases. Although ...
Some legal researchers may assume that all cases decided by federal courts are published. However, m...
Unpublished appellate judicial opinions present formidable challenges for modern legal researchers, ...
The federal courts of appeals have used unpublished opinions for thirty years as one method of cop...
Imagine that you are an attorney, litigating an appellate case with an atypical fact pattern. You ar...
The rise of cases brought before federal appellate courts has caused most opinions to be designated ...
This article discusses the courts\u27 adoption of the limited publication plans and analyzes the met...
On December 1, 2006, Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.1 will take effect, allowing citation to...
This Comment is divided into seven parts. Part I provides an overview of the current practice concer...
A Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure that took effect at the end of 2006 overturned past policies i...
Professor Dragich examines the no-citation rules of the federal courts of appeals in light of the pu...
An unfair system has evolved over the past fifteen years in the federal courts. The federal courts c...
Debate over unpublished judicial opinions and no-citation rules frequently proceeds without full and...