Dear Bill: I had originally intended to dissent but defected and joined your Per Curiam. That, however, was before John circulated his subversive dissent. You can therefore credit (or blame) him for my defection back to my original decision, reflected in the enclosed
Dear Byron, Please join me in your opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part
Your opinion for the Court faithfully reflects the conclusions of the Conference majority, of which ...
Dear Bill: This refers to your memorandum of February 3, in which you propose three alternatives. My...
Dear Bill: I had originally intended to dissent but defected and joined your Per Curiam. That, howev...
John\u27s dissent suggests more problems with this case than I had fully appreciated and I am going ...
Correspondence from Brennan to Rehnquist saying that he is writing his own dissent
Dear Bill: I am about to land somewhere between Brennan and Stevens. Will let you know soon
Dear Bill: In tardy response to your memorandum of February 3, I would be content with footnote two ...
Dear Bill: In view of the changes in your second draft, I am happy to join you Per Curiam
Dear Bill: I will be glad to join your Per Curiam opinion if you make changes along the lines indica...
Dear Bill: This is in response to your memorandum of February 3. My preference, like yours, is the f...
I agree with your dissent in this case and should appreciate your adding my name to your opinion
Dear Bill, I have been troubled by the same concerns that bothered Thurgood. If. however, you can re...
Correspondence from Brennan to Stevens, asking him to join him in Steven\u27s dissent
Dear Bill, I strongly prefer the second alternative suggested in your memorandum of today. Adoption ...
Dear Byron, Please join me in your opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part
Your opinion for the Court faithfully reflects the conclusions of the Conference majority, of which ...
Dear Bill: This refers to your memorandum of February 3, in which you propose three alternatives. My...
Dear Bill: I had originally intended to dissent but defected and joined your Per Curiam. That, howev...
John\u27s dissent suggests more problems with this case than I had fully appreciated and I am going ...
Correspondence from Brennan to Rehnquist saying that he is writing his own dissent
Dear Bill: I am about to land somewhere between Brennan and Stevens. Will let you know soon
Dear Bill: In tardy response to your memorandum of February 3, I would be content with footnote two ...
Dear Bill: In view of the changes in your second draft, I am happy to join you Per Curiam
Dear Bill: I will be glad to join your Per Curiam opinion if you make changes along the lines indica...
Dear Bill: This is in response to your memorandum of February 3. My preference, like yours, is the f...
I agree with your dissent in this case and should appreciate your adding my name to your opinion
Dear Bill, I have been troubled by the same concerns that bothered Thurgood. If. however, you can re...
Correspondence from Brennan to Stevens, asking him to join him in Steven\u27s dissent
Dear Bill, I strongly prefer the second alternative suggested in your memorandum of today. Adoption ...
Dear Byron, Please join me in your opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part
Your opinion for the Court faithfully reflects the conclusions of the Conference majority, of which ...
Dear Bill: This refers to your memorandum of February 3, in which you propose three alternatives. My...