Add to ORKGDear Bill: This is in response to your memorandum of February 3. My preference, like yours, is the first alternative. I could, however, go along with the second. I would not go along with the third
A correspondence from Alan S. Madans to Justice Blackmun. A correspondence from Justice Blackmun to ...
Your opinion for the Court faithfully reflects the conclusions of the Conference majority, of which ...
Correspondence from Blackmun to White agreeing with the proposed inquiry on reargument
Dear Bill: In tardy response to your memorandum of February 3, I would be content with footnote two ...
Dear Bill: This refers to your memorandum of February 3, in which you propose three alternatives. My...
Dear Bill, I strongly prefer the second alternative suggested in your memorandum of today. Adoption ...
Dear Bill: In view of the changes in your second draft, I am happy to join you Per Curiam
Dear Bill: I will be glad to join your Per Curiam opinion if you make changes along the lines indica...
Dear Bill: I am about to land somewhere between Brennan and Stevens. Will let you know soon
Would it be at all possible to persuade you to add the following as a footnote dropped at the end of...
Dear Bill, I have been troubled by the same concerns that bothered Thurgood. If. however, you can re...
Correspondence from Rehnquist to White agreeing with the proposed direction that he circulated
Dear Bill: I agree that we could DIG this case, and if this is the wish of five other Justices I wil...
Dear Chief: I have read over your proposed oral announcement in this case, and it is entirely agreea...
Dear Bill: I had originally intended to dissent but defected and joined your Per Curiam. That, howev...
A correspondence from Alan S. Madans to Justice Blackmun. A correspondence from Justice Blackmun to ...
Your opinion for the Court faithfully reflects the conclusions of the Conference majority, of which ...
Correspondence from Blackmun to White agreeing with the proposed inquiry on reargument
Dear Bill: In tardy response to your memorandum of February 3, I would be content with footnote two ...
Dear Bill: This refers to your memorandum of February 3, in which you propose three alternatives. My...
Dear Bill, I strongly prefer the second alternative suggested in your memorandum of today. Adoption ...
Dear Bill: In view of the changes in your second draft, I am happy to join you Per Curiam
Dear Bill: I will be glad to join your Per Curiam opinion if you make changes along the lines indica...
Dear Bill: I am about to land somewhere between Brennan and Stevens. Will let you know soon
Would it be at all possible to persuade you to add the following as a footnote dropped at the end of...
Dear Bill, I have been troubled by the same concerns that bothered Thurgood. If. however, you can re...
Correspondence from Rehnquist to White agreeing with the proposed direction that he circulated
Dear Bill: I agree that we could DIG this case, and if this is the wish of five other Justices I wil...
Dear Chief: I have read over your proposed oral announcement in this case, and it is entirely agreea...
Dear Bill: I had originally intended to dissent but defected and joined your Per Curiam. That, howev...
A correspondence from Alan S. Madans to Justice Blackmun. A correspondence from Justice Blackmun to ...
Your opinion for the Court faithfully reflects the conclusions of the Conference majority, of which ...
Correspondence from Blackmun to White agreeing with the proposed inquiry on reargument