Add to ORKGDear Bill: This refers to your memorandum of February 3, in which you propose three alternatives. My first choice is your first alternative; I could join you on the second; but I would part company with you on the third
Dear Bill: I agreed once with your opinion in 73-5768, FRANCISCO v. GATHRIGHT. I regret only that yo...
Correspondence from Chief Justice Burger to Rehnquist indicating that he joins him
Dear Chief: I have read over your proposed oral announcement in this case, and it is entirely agreea...
Dear Bill: This is in response to your memorandum of February 3. My preference, like yours, is the f...
Dear Bill: I will be glad to join your Per Curiam opinion if you make changes along the lines indica...
Dear Bill: In view of the changes in your second draft, I am happy to join you Per Curiam
Dear Bill, I strongly prefer the second alternative suggested in your memorandum of today. Adoption ...
Dear Bill: In tardy response to your memorandum of February 3, I would be content with footnote two ...
Correspondence from Powell to Rehnquist requesting him to join him in his opinion
Dear Bill: I agree that we could DIG this case, and if this is the wish of five other Justices I wil...
Dear Bill, I have been troubled by the same concerns that bothered Thurgood. If. however, you can re...
Dear Bill: I am about to land somewhere between Brennan and Stevens. Will let you know soon
Dear Lewis: When you first circulated your proposed disposition of this case, I wrote you that I wou...
Correspondence from Rehnquist to White agreeing with the proposed direction that he circulated
Correspondence from Powell to White agreeing with the statements regarding reargument
Dear Bill: I agreed once with your opinion in 73-5768, FRANCISCO v. GATHRIGHT. I regret only that yo...
Correspondence from Chief Justice Burger to Rehnquist indicating that he joins him
Dear Chief: I have read over your proposed oral announcement in this case, and it is entirely agreea...
Dear Bill: This is in response to your memorandum of February 3. My preference, like yours, is the f...
Dear Bill: I will be glad to join your Per Curiam opinion if you make changes along the lines indica...
Dear Bill: In view of the changes in your second draft, I am happy to join you Per Curiam
Dear Bill, I strongly prefer the second alternative suggested in your memorandum of today. Adoption ...
Dear Bill: In tardy response to your memorandum of February 3, I would be content with footnote two ...
Correspondence from Powell to Rehnquist requesting him to join him in his opinion
Dear Bill: I agree that we could DIG this case, and if this is the wish of five other Justices I wil...
Dear Bill, I have been troubled by the same concerns that bothered Thurgood. If. however, you can re...
Dear Bill: I am about to land somewhere between Brennan and Stevens. Will let you know soon
Dear Lewis: When you first circulated your proposed disposition of this case, I wrote you that I wou...
Correspondence from Rehnquist to White agreeing with the proposed direction that he circulated
Correspondence from Powell to White agreeing with the statements regarding reargument
Dear Bill: I agreed once with your opinion in 73-5768, FRANCISCO v. GATHRIGHT. I regret only that yo...
Correspondence from Chief Justice Burger to Rehnquist indicating that he joins him
Dear Chief: I have read over your proposed oral announcement in this case, and it is entirely agreea...