We humans can show presumption, arrogance and many dubious traits. By virtue of being land-dwelling, dexterous, relatively intelligent, and having good communication hardware and (good) fortune, we have for recent millennia largely had dominion of our planet. Yet humans often do not treat themselves (let alone other species) particularly well. Treves et al.’s idea of a multispecies justice system — not “prioritizing humans” but “finding practical ways to work within human systems” — invites consideration
Treves et al. (2019) propose a non-anthropocentric approach to conservation biology for the ‘just pr...
Treves et al.’s proposal is welcome, but it will have to face at least four challenges: the intercon...
Chapman & Huffman suggest that humans’ views of their own superiority are a source of their callousn...
We humans can show presumption, arrogance and many dubious traits. By virtue of being land-dwelling,...
Treves et al. are right about the need for morally just preservation of nonhumans. Their suggestions...
Treves et al.’s target article can play an important role in reconciling the needs of future generat...
We are failing to protect the biosphere. Novel views of conservation, preservation, and sustainabili...
Treves et al. propose a tangible shift in current discourse and practice related to the human relati...
For interspecies justice, animal welfare, and animal rights, the planet needs to be divided on the b...
To represent diverse interests successfully, a strategy for dealing with conflicts is needed. We dis...
I agree with Treves et al.’s proposal for a preservation ethics based on the principle that nonhuman...
This commentary discusses the representation of individuals versus populations — human and nonhuman,...
We share Chapman & Huffman’s views on the importance of promoting animal welfare and conservation. W...
Whilst fundamental to human societies, collective decision-making such as voting systems can lead to...
Abstract We as a species have been endowed by nature with an intelligence superior to all other spe...
Treves et al. (2019) propose a non-anthropocentric approach to conservation biology for the ‘just pr...
Treves et al.’s proposal is welcome, but it will have to face at least four challenges: the intercon...
Chapman & Huffman suggest that humans’ views of their own superiority are a source of their callousn...
We humans can show presumption, arrogance and many dubious traits. By virtue of being land-dwelling,...
Treves et al. are right about the need for morally just preservation of nonhumans. Their suggestions...
Treves et al.’s target article can play an important role in reconciling the needs of future generat...
We are failing to protect the biosphere. Novel views of conservation, preservation, and sustainabili...
Treves et al. propose a tangible shift in current discourse and practice related to the human relati...
For interspecies justice, animal welfare, and animal rights, the planet needs to be divided on the b...
To represent diverse interests successfully, a strategy for dealing with conflicts is needed. We dis...
I agree with Treves et al.’s proposal for a preservation ethics based on the principle that nonhuman...
This commentary discusses the representation of individuals versus populations — human and nonhuman,...
We share Chapman & Huffman’s views on the importance of promoting animal welfare and conservation. W...
Whilst fundamental to human societies, collective decision-making such as voting systems can lead to...
Abstract We as a species have been endowed by nature with an intelligence superior to all other spe...
Treves et al. (2019) propose a non-anthropocentric approach to conservation biology for the ‘just pr...
Treves et al.’s proposal is welcome, but it will have to face at least four challenges: the intercon...
Chapman & Huffman suggest that humans’ views of their own superiority are a source of their callousn...