Treves et al. (2019) propose a non-anthropocentric approach to conservation biology for the ‘just preservation’ of non-humans. Some of our current ways of ranking conservation efforts based on benefits to humans are indeed critically flawed, but we doubt that a completely non-anthropocentric approach is possible at this time. We propose a way to generate public support for those non-human species that may otherwise be overlooked in policy-making and conservation efforts
Chapman & Huffman suggest that humans’ views of their own superiority are a source of their callousn...
Treves et al. are right about the need for morally just preservation of nonhumans. Their suggestions...
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Despite their high diversity and importance for h...
Treves et al. (2019) propose a non-anthropocentric approach to conservation biology for the ‘just pr...
Treves et al.’s target article can play an important role in reconciling the needs of future generat...
We are failing to protect the biosphere. Novel views of conservation, preservation, and sustainabili...
Treves, Santiago-Avila, and Lynn (2019) argue for adopting a non-anthropocentric worldview to preven...
Treves et al. (2019) argue that individual organisms should be protected by the courts. This already...
Climate change, agricultural intensification, and other anthropogenic ecosystem challenges have caus...
Treves et al. explain the need to preserve the rights of nonhuman species, human youth, and future g...
Treves et al. (2019) make a convincing case that conservation efforts need to go beyond an anthropoc...
Treves, Santiago-Avila, and Lynn (2019) argue for adopting a non-anthropocentric worldview to preven...
The conservation of species is one of the foundations of conservation biology. Successful species co...
Wildlife conservation is of the utmost importance to the preservation of a healthy planet, with the ...
Insects have been immensely successful as an animal group. They dominate compositional diversity of ...
Chapman & Huffman suggest that humans’ views of their own superiority are a source of their callousn...
Treves et al. are right about the need for morally just preservation of nonhumans. Their suggestions...
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Despite their high diversity and importance for h...
Treves et al. (2019) propose a non-anthropocentric approach to conservation biology for the ‘just pr...
Treves et al.’s target article can play an important role in reconciling the needs of future generat...
We are failing to protect the biosphere. Novel views of conservation, preservation, and sustainabili...
Treves, Santiago-Avila, and Lynn (2019) argue for adopting a non-anthropocentric worldview to preven...
Treves et al. (2019) argue that individual organisms should be protected by the courts. This already...
Climate change, agricultural intensification, and other anthropogenic ecosystem challenges have caus...
Treves et al. explain the need to preserve the rights of nonhuman species, human youth, and future g...
Treves et al. (2019) make a convincing case that conservation efforts need to go beyond an anthropoc...
Treves, Santiago-Avila, and Lynn (2019) argue for adopting a non-anthropocentric worldview to preven...
The conservation of species is one of the foundations of conservation biology. Successful species co...
Wildlife conservation is of the utmost importance to the preservation of a healthy planet, with the ...
Insects have been immensely successful as an animal group. They dominate compositional diversity of ...
Chapman & Huffman suggest that humans’ views of their own superiority are a source of their callousn...
Treves et al. are right about the need for morally just preservation of nonhumans. Their suggestions...
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Despite their high diversity and importance for h...