Treves et al. (2019) make a convincing case that conservation efforts need to go beyond an anthropocentric worldview. Implementing that vision, however, will require human advocates to represent nonhuman interests. Where will the knowledge of those interests come from? How can humans know what is in the best interest of another animal, a plant, or an ecosystem? We discuss how the values embedded in current scientific practices may be ill-suited to representing nonhuman interests and we offer some ideas for correcting these shortcomings
Leading societies toward a more sustainable, equitably shared, and environmentally just future requi...
In this article we focus upon a division between generalized schools of philosophical and ethical th...
Human-Wildlife Conflicts (HWCs) occur when nonhuman animals’ needs clash with those of humans. One r...
Treves et al. (2019) propose a non-anthropocentric approach to conservation biology for the ‘just pr...
Humans often intervene in the wild for anthropocentric or environmental reasons. An example of such ...
Stakeholder theory has grown into one of the most frequent approaches to organizational sustainabili...
Treves, Santiago-Avila, and Lynn (2019) argue for adopting a non-anthropocentric worldview to preven...
Our commentators come from many fields and disciplines and express highly divergent views, illustrat...
We are failing to protect the biosphere. Novel views of conservation, preservation, and sustainabili...
Treves et al.’s target article can play an important role in reconciling the needs of future generat...
Treves et al.’s proposal is welcome, but it will have to face at least four challenges: the intercon...
Chapman & Huffman suggest that humans’ views of their own superiority are a source of their callousn...
Treves, Santiago-Avila, and Lynn (2019) argue for adopting a non-anthropocentric worldview to preven...
The paper is intended to provide comments on the problems that arise from the twofold relationship b...
Treves et al.’s target article emphasizes the importance of including nonhuman animals in the scope ...
Leading societies toward a more sustainable, equitably shared, and environmentally just future requi...
In this article we focus upon a division between generalized schools of philosophical and ethical th...
Human-Wildlife Conflicts (HWCs) occur when nonhuman animals’ needs clash with those of humans. One r...
Treves et al. (2019) propose a non-anthropocentric approach to conservation biology for the ‘just pr...
Humans often intervene in the wild for anthropocentric or environmental reasons. An example of such ...
Stakeholder theory has grown into one of the most frequent approaches to organizational sustainabili...
Treves, Santiago-Avila, and Lynn (2019) argue for adopting a non-anthropocentric worldview to preven...
Our commentators come from many fields and disciplines and express highly divergent views, illustrat...
We are failing to protect the biosphere. Novel views of conservation, preservation, and sustainabili...
Treves et al.’s target article can play an important role in reconciling the needs of future generat...
Treves et al.’s proposal is welcome, but it will have to face at least four challenges: the intercon...
Chapman & Huffman suggest that humans’ views of their own superiority are a source of their callousn...
Treves, Santiago-Avila, and Lynn (2019) argue for adopting a non-anthropocentric worldview to preven...
The paper is intended to provide comments on the problems that arise from the twofold relationship b...
Treves et al.’s target article emphasizes the importance of including nonhuman animals in the scope ...
Leading societies toward a more sustainable, equitably shared, and environmentally just future requi...
In this article we focus upon a division between generalized schools of philosophical and ethical th...
Human-Wildlife Conflicts (HWCs) occur when nonhuman animals’ needs clash with those of humans. One r...