Add to ORKGTreves et al.’s proposal is welcome, but it will have to face at least four challenges: the interconnectedness of the human and the nonhuman portions of the biosphere, conflicts of interest, human overpopulation, and capitalism itself
I agree with Treves et al.’s proposal for a preservation ethics based on the principle that nonhuman...
For interspecies justice, animal welfare, and animal rights, the planet needs to be divided on the b...
Treves et al. (2019) make a convincing case that conservation efforts need to go beyond an anthropoc...
Most aspects of Treves et al.’s target article are commendable, but I would suggest: explicitly in...
Treves et al.’s proposal is welcome, but it will have to face at least four challenges: the intercon...
This commentary discusses the representation of individuals versus populations — human and nonhuman,...
Treves et al. (2019) argue that policy making should include the interests and well-being of present...
Treves et al. are right about the need for morally just preservation of nonhumans. Their suggestions...
Treves et al.’s target article can play an important role in reconciling the needs of future generat...
To represent diverse interests successfully, a strategy for dealing with conflicts is needed. We dis...
Treves, Santiago-Avila, and Lynn (2019) argue for adopting a non-anthropocentric worldview to preven...
Treves et al. propose a tangible shift in current discourse and practice related to the human relati...
We are failing to protect the biosphere. Novel views of conservation, preservation, and sustainabili...
Treves et al. (2019) propose a non-anthropocentric approach to conservation biology for the ‘just pr...
Treves, Santiago-Avila, and Lynn (2019) argue for adopting a non-anthropocentric worldview to preven...
I agree with Treves et al.’s proposal for a preservation ethics based on the principle that nonhuman...
For interspecies justice, animal welfare, and animal rights, the planet needs to be divided on the b...
Treves et al. (2019) make a convincing case that conservation efforts need to go beyond an anthropoc...
Most aspects of Treves et al.’s target article are commendable, but I would suggest: explicitly in...
Treves et al.’s proposal is welcome, but it will have to face at least four challenges: the intercon...
This commentary discusses the representation of individuals versus populations — human and nonhuman,...
Treves et al. (2019) argue that policy making should include the interests and well-being of present...
Treves et al. are right about the need for morally just preservation of nonhumans. Their suggestions...
Treves et al.’s target article can play an important role in reconciling the needs of future generat...
To represent diverse interests successfully, a strategy for dealing with conflicts is needed. We dis...
Treves, Santiago-Avila, and Lynn (2019) argue for adopting a non-anthropocentric worldview to preven...
Treves et al. propose a tangible shift in current discourse and practice related to the human relati...
We are failing to protect the biosphere. Novel views of conservation, preservation, and sustainabili...
Treves et al. (2019) propose a non-anthropocentric approach to conservation biology for the ‘just pr...
Treves, Santiago-Avila, and Lynn (2019) argue for adopting a non-anthropocentric worldview to preven...
I agree with Treves et al.’s proposal for a preservation ethics based on the principle that nonhuman...
For interspecies justice, animal welfare, and animal rights, the planet needs to be divided on the b...
Treves et al. (2019) make a convincing case that conservation efforts need to go beyond an anthropoc...