This response first looks at the historical understanding of foreign sovereign immunity and the ways in which it should inform our reading of Article III. It then considers the role that sovereign immunity protections for foreign nations currently play. It closes with a suggestion that—while the sovereign immunity regime is largely adequate to protect other nations’ interests—Professor Wuerth’s insights nonetheless have a role to play in our understanding of cases involving foreign sovereigns
In Republic of Austria v. Altmann, the U.S. Supreme Court decided that the Foreign Sovereign Immunit...
The article provides a fresh re-examination of the conceptual foundations of the sovereign immunity ...
Under the concept of sovereign or governmental immunity, a state may not be sued in tort without its...
This response first looks at the historical understanding of foreign sovereign immunity and the ways...
Are foreign States and governments (and their state-owned enterprises) “persons” for constitutional ...
Professor Wuerth’s article is a significant piece of scholarship. This brief comment is devoted, not...
Clarity would be promoted by treating Article III—which primarily concerns subject matter jurisdicti...
This response evaluates whether Professor Wuerth’s reading of the Constitution is correct. In so doi...
Some of the more pressing issues related to global governance and world order lie at the intersectio...
If the international law of immunity once purported to make foreign states, their rulers, their offi...
The rights of foreign states under the U.S. Constitution are becoming more important as the actions ...
Every author writing on U.S. law for this symposium notes that the extent to which the Executive Bra...
Sovereign immunity being a traditional part of international law has evolved through a wide array. A...
The doctrine of the immunity of foreign governments from the adjudicatory and enforcement jurisdicti...
The immunity systems in international law commonly encompass the concept of jurisdictional immunity,...
In Republic of Austria v. Altmann, the U.S. Supreme Court decided that the Foreign Sovereign Immunit...
The article provides a fresh re-examination of the conceptual foundations of the sovereign immunity ...
Under the concept of sovereign or governmental immunity, a state may not be sued in tort without its...
This response first looks at the historical understanding of foreign sovereign immunity and the ways...
Are foreign States and governments (and their state-owned enterprises) “persons” for constitutional ...
Professor Wuerth’s article is a significant piece of scholarship. This brief comment is devoted, not...
Clarity would be promoted by treating Article III—which primarily concerns subject matter jurisdicti...
This response evaluates whether Professor Wuerth’s reading of the Constitution is correct. In so doi...
Some of the more pressing issues related to global governance and world order lie at the intersectio...
If the international law of immunity once purported to make foreign states, their rulers, their offi...
The rights of foreign states under the U.S. Constitution are becoming more important as the actions ...
Every author writing on U.S. law for this symposium notes that the extent to which the Executive Bra...
Sovereign immunity being a traditional part of international law has evolved through a wide array. A...
The doctrine of the immunity of foreign governments from the adjudicatory and enforcement jurisdicti...
The immunity systems in international law commonly encompass the concept of jurisdictional immunity,...
In Republic of Austria v. Altmann, the U.S. Supreme Court decided that the Foreign Sovereign Immunit...
The article provides a fresh re-examination of the conceptual foundations of the sovereign immunity ...
Under the concept of sovereign or governmental immunity, a state may not be sued in tort without its...