This response evaluates whether Professor Wuerth’s reading of the Constitution is correct. In so doing, this response considers the original understanding of these provisions, the law of nations as understood during the founding era, and Supreme Court case law close to the time of the founding. As explained below, I conclude that it is questionable that the Constitution extends rights to foreign nations
At several junctures, scholars have wondered what constitutional personal jurisdiction doctrine can ...
In our system of government, the Constitution has conferred a guarantees of certain rights to its ci...
Recent decisions by the United States Supreme Court and extracurricular discussions between some of ...
Are foreign States and governments (and their state-owned enterprises) “persons” for constitutional ...
Some of the more pressing issues related to global governance and world order lie at the intersectio...
Clarity would be promoted by treating Article III—which primarily concerns subject matter jurisdicti...
Professor Wuerth’s article is a significant piece of scholarship. This brief comment is devoted, not...
This response argues that Wuerth’s paper illustrates the most persuasive way to go about the task—on...
This response first looks at the historical understanding of foreign sovereign immunity and the ways...
In this solicited response to Ingrid Wuerth\u27s The Due Process and Other Constitutional Rights of...
The rights of foreign states under the U.S. Constitution are becoming more important as the actions ...
Defining the scope of the Constitution’s application outside U.S. territory is more important than e...
We are grateful to the judges and scholars who participated in this Symposium examining our book, Th...
Courts and commentators have long struggled to reconcile robust federalism doctrines with the text o...
The Law of Nations and the United States Constitution offers a new lens through which anyone interes...
At several junctures, scholars have wondered what constitutional personal jurisdiction doctrine can ...
In our system of government, the Constitution has conferred a guarantees of certain rights to its ci...
Recent decisions by the United States Supreme Court and extracurricular discussions between some of ...
Are foreign States and governments (and their state-owned enterprises) “persons” for constitutional ...
Some of the more pressing issues related to global governance and world order lie at the intersectio...
Clarity would be promoted by treating Article III—which primarily concerns subject matter jurisdicti...
Professor Wuerth’s article is a significant piece of scholarship. This brief comment is devoted, not...
This response argues that Wuerth’s paper illustrates the most persuasive way to go about the task—on...
This response first looks at the historical understanding of foreign sovereign immunity and the ways...
In this solicited response to Ingrid Wuerth\u27s The Due Process and Other Constitutional Rights of...
The rights of foreign states under the U.S. Constitution are becoming more important as the actions ...
Defining the scope of the Constitution’s application outside U.S. territory is more important than e...
We are grateful to the judges and scholars who participated in this Symposium examining our book, Th...
Courts and commentators have long struggled to reconcile robust federalism doctrines with the text o...
The Law of Nations and the United States Constitution offers a new lens through which anyone interes...
At several junctures, scholars have wondered what constitutional personal jurisdiction doctrine can ...
In our system of government, the Constitution has conferred a guarantees of certain rights to its ci...
Recent decisions by the United States Supreme Court and extracurricular discussions between some of ...