Are foreign States and governments (and their state-owned enterprises) “persons” for constitutional purposes? Do they—should they—have “due process” rights under the U.S. Constitution? Ingrid Wuerth’s thoughtful and thoroughly researched article addresses those important questions from both the historical and doctrinal perspectives and proposes an innovative approach to resolving the issues. The following commentary provides additional background and context, briefly tracing the origins and history of relevant U.S. case law and noting some of the practical implications of answering the questions affirmatively or negatively, particularly in light of the various exceptions to U.S. jurisdiction under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. It pr...
The Supreme Courts recent reliance on foreign precedent to interpret the Constitution sparked a fire...
A great deal has been written about the personal jurisdiction of state courts and particularly about...
The Due Process Clause with its focus on a defendant\u27s liberty interest has become the key, if no...
Are foreign States and governments (and their state-owned enterprises) “persons” for constitutional ...
This response evaluates whether Professor Wuerth’s reading of the Constitution is correct. In so doi...
Clarity would be promoted by treating Article III—which primarily concerns subject matter jurisdicti...
Some of the more pressing issues related to global governance and world order lie at the intersectio...
Professor Wuerth’s article is a significant piece of scholarship. This brief comment is devoted, not...
This response first looks at the historical understanding of foreign sovereign immunity and the ways...
The rights of foreign states under the U.S. Constitution are becoming more important as the actions ...
In this solicited response to Ingrid Wuerth\u27s The Due Process and Other Constitutional Rights of...
At several junctures, scholars have wondered what constitutional personal jurisdiction doctrine can ...
Defining the scope of the Constitution’s application outside U.S. territory is more important than e...
2019 has seen extensive discussion of due process in the American public sphere. There is a cultural...
This article does not advocate judicial abstention from deciding the constitutional claims of foreig...
The Supreme Courts recent reliance on foreign precedent to interpret the Constitution sparked a fire...
A great deal has been written about the personal jurisdiction of state courts and particularly about...
The Due Process Clause with its focus on a defendant\u27s liberty interest has become the key, if no...
Are foreign States and governments (and their state-owned enterprises) “persons” for constitutional ...
This response evaluates whether Professor Wuerth’s reading of the Constitution is correct. In so doi...
Clarity would be promoted by treating Article III—which primarily concerns subject matter jurisdicti...
Some of the more pressing issues related to global governance and world order lie at the intersectio...
Professor Wuerth’s article is a significant piece of scholarship. This brief comment is devoted, not...
This response first looks at the historical understanding of foreign sovereign immunity and the ways...
The rights of foreign states under the U.S. Constitution are becoming more important as the actions ...
In this solicited response to Ingrid Wuerth\u27s The Due Process and Other Constitutional Rights of...
At several junctures, scholars have wondered what constitutional personal jurisdiction doctrine can ...
Defining the scope of the Constitution’s application outside U.S. territory is more important than e...
2019 has seen extensive discussion of due process in the American public sphere. There is a cultural...
This article does not advocate judicial abstention from deciding the constitutional claims of foreig...
The Supreme Courts recent reliance on foreign precedent to interpret the Constitution sparked a fire...
A great deal has been written about the personal jurisdiction of state courts and particularly about...
The Due Process Clause with its focus on a defendant\u27s liberty interest has become the key, if no...