Add to ORKGUnder the concept of sovereign or governmental immunity, a state may not be sued in tort without its consent. This doctrine, though the subject of repeated judicial challenges, is adhered to in a significant number of jurisdictions. It is the contention of this article that the reason for the rule no longer exists and that it should, therefore, be abolished as a controlling legal principle. Moreover, it is submitted that sovereign immunity violates the due process and equal protection
The doctrine of sovereign immunity dictates that courts lack jurisdiction to review cases challengin...
Until recently, sovereign immunity—the doctrine that protects state entities from suit without the S...
In discussing the current statute abrogating the doctrine of sovereign immunity, the authors trace t...
Under the concept of sovereign or governmental immunity, a state may not be sued in tort without its...
In recent years, the Supreme Court has substantially expanded the scope of state sovereign immunity....
The morass of recent Supreme Court state sovereign immunity jurisprudence is closely examined. Rathe...
Very early in our history we took steps to insure that the.rule of law, as expressed in the Constitu...
Twenty years have passed since the Supreme Court announced dramatic changes to the doctrine of state...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court refuses to abolish the doctrine of sovereign immunity. Dillon v. York...
With the enduring doctrine of federal sovereign immunity, it is too late in the day to suggest that ...
States normally enjoy immunity from suit by private parties, but they may waive this immunity. The S...
In this article, I argue that state sovereign and official immunities, insofar as they bar recovery ...
This Article attempts to clarify the doctrine of sovereign immunity and its exceptions in its applic...
The Supreme Court's state sovereign immunity jurisprudence has undergone a fundamental change. Altho...
The fear of judicial legislation\u27 frequently has restrained courts from abrogating the doctrines ...
The doctrine of sovereign immunity dictates that courts lack jurisdiction to review cases challengin...
Until recently, sovereign immunity—the doctrine that protects state entities from suit without the S...
In discussing the current statute abrogating the doctrine of sovereign immunity, the authors trace t...
Under the concept of sovereign or governmental immunity, a state may not be sued in tort without its...
In recent years, the Supreme Court has substantially expanded the scope of state sovereign immunity....
The morass of recent Supreme Court state sovereign immunity jurisprudence is closely examined. Rathe...
Very early in our history we took steps to insure that the.rule of law, as expressed in the Constitu...
Twenty years have passed since the Supreme Court announced dramatic changes to the doctrine of state...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court refuses to abolish the doctrine of sovereign immunity. Dillon v. York...
With the enduring doctrine of federal sovereign immunity, it is too late in the day to suggest that ...
States normally enjoy immunity from suit by private parties, but they may waive this immunity. The S...
In this article, I argue that state sovereign and official immunities, insofar as they bar recovery ...
This Article attempts to clarify the doctrine of sovereign immunity and its exceptions in its applic...
The Supreme Court's state sovereign immunity jurisprudence has undergone a fundamental change. Altho...
The fear of judicial legislation\u27 frequently has restrained courts from abrogating the doctrines ...
The doctrine of sovereign immunity dictates that courts lack jurisdiction to review cases challengin...
Until recently, sovereign immunity—the doctrine that protects state entities from suit without the S...
In discussing the current statute abrogating the doctrine of sovereign immunity, the authors trace t...