Topics
seat beltDevice
.jpg%3Fwidth%3D300&w=3840&q=75)
crashworthyDisease
The author discusses the recent imposition of a duty on automobile manufacturers to design a product that is crashworthy. He concludes that the courts will use a balancing test to determine the scope of that duty, and discusses the application of this test. Various attendant problems, such as the seat belt defense and the relevance of uniform federal safety standards, are also considered
The chariots shall rage in the streets was a prediction announced twenty-five centuries ago. The de...
Less than two years after the 1961 Pontiac Tempest was introduced to the public, the General Motors ...
This Article lays out the potential (at this point purely theoretical) deterrence benefits of replac...
The author discusses the recent imposition of a duty on automobile manufacturers to design a product...
Unobtrusively, but with increasing frequency, the courts are rejecting a theory of liability being v...
It is the purpose of this article to review the decisional law of automobile crashworthiness and to ...
Products Liability- AUTOMOBILE MANUFACTURER MUST DESIGN AND BUILD A CRASHWORTHY AUTOMOBILE
Each year approximately twenty per cent of all traffic fatalities in the United States are pedestria...
This Article will consider the problems engendered by imprecise judicial analysis of the notion of d...
The expanding scope of product liability raised questions concerning the status of prior legal conce...
This Comment emphasizes automotive design. This is for two reasons. Most enhanced injury cases arise...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that when a driver of an automobil...
The concept of crashworthiness has now been accepted by a resounding majority of states if not all s...
The law of automobile product liability in the United States developed intially through a process of...
The author discusses and compares the various theories of recovery available in a product liability ...
The chariots shall rage in the streets was a prediction announced twenty-five centuries ago. The de...
Less than two years after the 1961 Pontiac Tempest was introduced to the public, the General Motors ...
This Article lays out the potential (at this point purely theoretical) deterrence benefits of replac...
The author discusses the recent imposition of a duty on automobile manufacturers to design a product...
Unobtrusively, but with increasing frequency, the courts are rejecting a theory of liability being v...
It is the purpose of this article to review the decisional law of automobile crashworthiness and to ...
Products Liability- AUTOMOBILE MANUFACTURER MUST DESIGN AND BUILD A CRASHWORTHY AUTOMOBILE
Each year approximately twenty per cent of all traffic fatalities in the United States are pedestria...
This Article will consider the problems engendered by imprecise judicial analysis of the notion of d...
The expanding scope of product liability raised questions concerning the status of prior legal conce...
This Comment emphasizes automotive design. This is for two reasons. Most enhanced injury cases arise...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that when a driver of an automobil...
The concept of crashworthiness has now been accepted by a resounding majority of states if not all s...
The law of automobile product liability in the United States developed intially through a process of...
The author discusses and compares the various theories of recovery available in a product liability ...
The chariots shall rage in the streets was a prediction announced twenty-five centuries ago. The de...
Less than two years after the 1961 Pontiac Tempest was introduced to the public, the General Motors ...
This Article lays out the potential (at this point purely theoretical) deterrence benefits of replac...
Add to ORKG