Add to ORKGThe United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that when a driver of an automobile is injured by a second collision with a defectively designed automobile headrest caused by a collision with another car whose driver was negligent, the plaintiff has the burden of showing how the damages should be apportioned between the manufacturer of the headrest and the negligent driver. Huddell v. Levin, 537 F.2d 726 (3d Cir. 1976)
Strict liability imposed by section 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts is designed to encoura...
The California Court of Appeals has held that a cause of action may be maintained in strict liabilit...
In Melia v. Ford Motor Co., the Court. of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit was called upon for the thi...
Nanda v. Ford Motor Co., 509 F.2d 213 (7th Cir. 1974) Nanda v. Ford Motor Co. involved an action aga...
Torts-PRODUCTS LIABILITY-DOCTRINE OF STRICT LIABILITY APPLICABLE IN SECOND COLLISION CASES RESULTING...
The author discusses the recent imposition of a duty on automobile manufacturers to design a product...
Products Liability- AUTOMOBILE MANUFACTURER MUST DESIGN AND BUILD A CRASHWORTHY AUTOMOBILE
Plaintiff brings action for personal injuries sustained when the car of defendant P, negligently dri...
Less than two years after the 1961 Pontiac Tempest was introduced to the public, the General Motors ...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that the lessor of a truck is not liable to lessee\u27s passenge...
Unobtrusively, but with increasing frequency, the courts are rejecting a theory of liability being v...
A sued B for injuries arising out of a collision between B\u27s taxicab and an automobile driven by ...
Automobiles - Constitutionality of Statute Making Owner Liable for Injury Caused by Another\u27s Neg...
This note will begin by examining the legal theories involved in merging the concepts of comparative...
This note will begin by examining the legal theories involved in merging the concepts of comparative...
Strict liability imposed by section 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts is designed to encoura...
The California Court of Appeals has held that a cause of action may be maintained in strict liabilit...
In Melia v. Ford Motor Co., the Court. of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit was called upon for the thi...
Nanda v. Ford Motor Co., 509 F.2d 213 (7th Cir. 1974) Nanda v. Ford Motor Co. involved an action aga...
Torts-PRODUCTS LIABILITY-DOCTRINE OF STRICT LIABILITY APPLICABLE IN SECOND COLLISION CASES RESULTING...
The author discusses the recent imposition of a duty on automobile manufacturers to design a product...
Products Liability- AUTOMOBILE MANUFACTURER MUST DESIGN AND BUILD A CRASHWORTHY AUTOMOBILE
Plaintiff brings action for personal injuries sustained when the car of defendant P, negligently dri...
Less than two years after the 1961 Pontiac Tempest was introduced to the public, the General Motors ...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that the lessor of a truck is not liable to lessee\u27s passenge...
Unobtrusively, but with increasing frequency, the courts are rejecting a theory of liability being v...
A sued B for injuries arising out of a collision between B\u27s taxicab and an automobile driven by ...
Automobiles - Constitutionality of Statute Making Owner Liable for Injury Caused by Another\u27s Neg...
This note will begin by examining the legal theories involved in merging the concepts of comparative...
This note will begin by examining the legal theories involved in merging the concepts of comparative...
Strict liability imposed by section 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts is designed to encoura...
The California Court of Appeals has held that a cause of action may be maintained in strict liabilit...
In Melia v. Ford Motor Co., the Court. of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit was called upon for the thi...