This Comment emphasizes automotive design. This is for two reasons. Most enhanced injury cases arise in this context, and, more significantly, no other product is associated with stronger public policy considerations nor affects society more broadly than the automobile. When faced with a case of first impression involving enhanced injury, courts can and should draw from many sources in developing an approach to the apportionment problem. First, the courts should look to the treatment enhanced injury cases have received in other jurisdictions. Second, they should seek guidance and analogize, if possible, from established tort doctrines. Finally, and most importantly, they should examine and weigh the policies that underlie the claim. Policy ...
This Comment considers the constitutionality of the Washington cap on noneconomic damages. The Comme...
This article examines whether the jurisprudence of the enhanced damages provision found in 35 U.S.C....
The California Court of Appeals has held that a cause of action may be maintained in strict liabilit...
The enhanced-injury doctrine imposes a negligence-based duty to reasonably minimize the foreseeable ...
The author discusses the recent imposition of a duty on automobile manufacturers to design a product...
It is fifty years, almost to a day, since the problem of liability for physical injuries to the plai...
While mandatory auto insurance laws virtually guarantee the availability of remedies for auto injuri...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that when a driver of an automobil...
This note will begin by examining the legal theories involved in merging the concepts of comparative...
Neither the Washington Legislature nor the Washington Supreme Court has addressed the issue of instr...
The ordinary rules of negligence, applied in actions brought by a guest against his host for injurie...
This note will begin by examining the legal theories involved in merging the concepts of comparative...
Tort and insurance law treat driving as a centrally important activity and treat injuries caused by ...
A troublesome problem in the field of accident insurance is the interpretation of the phrase by acc...
This Comment examines Washington\u27s application of the design defect consumer expectations test. W...
This Comment considers the constitutionality of the Washington cap on noneconomic damages. The Comme...
This article examines whether the jurisprudence of the enhanced damages provision found in 35 U.S.C....
The California Court of Appeals has held that a cause of action may be maintained in strict liabilit...
The enhanced-injury doctrine imposes a negligence-based duty to reasonably minimize the foreseeable ...
The author discusses the recent imposition of a duty on automobile manufacturers to design a product...
It is fifty years, almost to a day, since the problem of liability for physical injuries to the plai...
While mandatory auto insurance laws virtually guarantee the availability of remedies for auto injuri...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that when a driver of an automobil...
This note will begin by examining the legal theories involved in merging the concepts of comparative...
Neither the Washington Legislature nor the Washington Supreme Court has addressed the issue of instr...
The ordinary rules of negligence, applied in actions brought by a guest against his host for injurie...
This note will begin by examining the legal theories involved in merging the concepts of comparative...
Tort and insurance law treat driving as a centrally important activity and treat injuries caused by ...
A troublesome problem in the field of accident insurance is the interpretation of the phrase by acc...
This Comment examines Washington\u27s application of the design defect consumer expectations test. W...
This Comment considers the constitutionality of the Washington cap on noneconomic damages. The Comme...
This article examines whether the jurisprudence of the enhanced damages provision found in 35 U.S.C....
The California Court of Appeals has held that a cause of action may be maintained in strict liabilit...