Add to ORKGA New Confederacy? Disunionism in the Federal Courts is a thought-provoking tour de force about many ills that federal court observers believe plague the modem federal district courts. In Disunionism, Professor Paul Carrington paints a perceptive portrait of the troubling conditions that he asserts impede civil litigation in a number of districts, and he trenchantly criticizes district judges for their contributions to these circumstances while admonishing the Judicial Conference to sweep our national courts clear of all local clutter
Writing in 1924, seventy-eight volumes ago, Professor Edson R. Sunderland began The Machinery of Pro...
I analyzed refinements in the experimentation which the Montana Federal District Court and other dis...
The Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990 (CJRA) has reached the mid-point of its implementation national...
Federal district courts have viewed the Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990 as a mandate to adopt proce...
The recent reforms of procedure in the federal courts are unique not merely be- cause of their advan...
Federal civil procedure is now byzantine. Lawyers and parties face, and federal judges apply, a bewi...
Much activity related to civil procedure recently occurred that could significantly affect practice ...
Following the adoption of the amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure relating to discove...
Two important lessons had been taught by the reactions to the Freund and Hruska Reports. One was tha...
The Federal Courts: Crisis and Reform can be viewed as not one but two books. Book I (pp. 1-192)...
Response to Prof. John B. Oakley\u27s writings comparing state court procedural rules with the Feder...
This Article begins by demonstrating that the proliferation of local rules indeed poses a threat to ...
Are our federal courts organized suitably to perform their mission of assuring coherent administrati...
Differences about how the business of federal circuit and district courts should be administered--as...
During the 1980s, both the Judicial Conference of the United States, which is the policy-making arm ...
Writing in 1924, seventy-eight volumes ago, Professor Edson R. Sunderland began The Machinery of Pro...
I analyzed refinements in the experimentation which the Montana Federal District Court and other dis...
The Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990 (CJRA) has reached the mid-point of its implementation national...
Federal district courts have viewed the Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990 as a mandate to adopt proce...
The recent reforms of procedure in the federal courts are unique not merely be- cause of their advan...
Federal civil procedure is now byzantine. Lawyers and parties face, and federal judges apply, a bewi...
Much activity related to civil procedure recently occurred that could significantly affect practice ...
Following the adoption of the amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure relating to discove...
Two important lessons had been taught by the reactions to the Freund and Hruska Reports. One was tha...
The Federal Courts: Crisis and Reform can be viewed as not one but two books. Book I (pp. 1-192)...
Response to Prof. John B. Oakley\u27s writings comparing state court procedural rules with the Feder...
This Article begins by demonstrating that the proliferation of local rules indeed poses a threat to ...
Are our federal courts organized suitably to perform their mission of assuring coherent administrati...
Differences about how the business of federal circuit and district courts should be administered--as...
During the 1980s, both the Judicial Conference of the United States, which is the policy-making arm ...
Writing in 1924, seventy-eight volumes ago, Professor Edson R. Sunderland began The Machinery of Pro...
I analyzed refinements in the experimentation which the Montana Federal District Court and other dis...
The Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990 (CJRA) has reached the mid-point of its implementation national...