Response to Prof. John B. Oakley\u27s writings comparing state court procedural rules with the Federal Rules of Civil procedure. Professor Oakley\u27s substantial contribution to the Nevada Law Journal dispute resolution symposium neither accords much treatment to how or why the earlier uniformity between state and federal procedural regimes changed so dramatically over such a brief period nor proffers very many suggestions for the future. My response aspires primarily to scrutinize how federal-state consistency deteriorated and secondarily to consider what, if any, measures should be instituted to change the present condition of state civil procedure in the fifty jurisdictions comprising the United States
Two decades of lively experience under the federal civil rules provide adequate perspective for both...
In 1938, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure were adopted. Their adoption represented a triumph of ...
State courts matter. Not only do state courts handle more than sixty times the number of civil cases...
In this article we present a new survey of the civil procedures of the fifty states and the District...
In this article we present a new survey of the civil procedures of the fifty states and the District...
In this article we present a new survey of the civil procedures of the fifty states and the District...
We have criticized the amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure since the 1980s and the pr...
We have criticized the amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure since the 1980s and the pr...
We have criticized the amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure since the 1980s and the pr...
State courts matter. Not only do state courts handle more than sixty times the number of civil cases...
State courts matter. Not only do state courts handle more than sixty times the number of civil cases...
Federal civil procedure is now byzantine. Lawyers and parties face, and federal judges apply, a bewi...
The drafters of the 1938 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure hoped to establish those rules as a model ...
With pleasure I responded to the invitation of the Editors to participate in a timely symposium on t...
State courts matter. Not only do state courts handle more than sixty times the number of civil cases...
Two decades of lively experience under the federal civil rules provide adequate perspective for both...
In 1938, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure were adopted. Their adoption represented a triumph of ...
State courts matter. Not only do state courts handle more than sixty times the number of civil cases...
In this article we present a new survey of the civil procedures of the fifty states and the District...
In this article we present a new survey of the civil procedures of the fifty states and the District...
In this article we present a new survey of the civil procedures of the fifty states and the District...
We have criticized the amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure since the 1980s and the pr...
We have criticized the amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure since the 1980s and the pr...
We have criticized the amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure since the 1980s and the pr...
State courts matter. Not only do state courts handle more than sixty times the number of civil cases...
State courts matter. Not only do state courts handle more than sixty times the number of civil cases...
Federal civil procedure is now byzantine. Lawyers and parties face, and federal judges apply, a bewi...
The drafters of the 1938 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure hoped to establish those rules as a model ...
With pleasure I responded to the invitation of the Editors to participate in a timely symposium on t...
State courts matter. Not only do state courts handle more than sixty times the number of civil cases...
Two decades of lively experience under the federal civil rules provide adequate perspective for both...
In 1938, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure were adopted. Their adoption represented a triumph of ...
State courts matter. Not only do state courts handle more than sixty times the number of civil cases...